Volume I: Innovation and Growth: The Classical Legacy
General Introduction
1. R. M. Solow, ‘Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 3, 1957, pp. 312–20.
2. N. Rosenberg, ‘Adam Smith on the Division of Labour: Two Views or One?’, Economica, 32, 126, 1965, pp. 127–39.
3. J. Schmookler, ‘The Level of Inventive Activity’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 36, 2, 1954, pp. 183–90.
4. N. Rosenberg, ‘Economic Experiments’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 1, 1, 1992, pp. 181–203.
5. N. Rosenberg, ‘The Direction of Technological Change: Inducement Mechanisms and Focusing Devices’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 18, 1, 1969, pp. 1–24.
6. W. Fellner, ‘Two Propositions in the Theory of Induced Innovation’, Economic Journal, 71, 282, 1961, pp. 305–8.
7. H. P. Binswanger, ‘Induced Technical Change: Evolution of Thought’, in H. P. Binswanger and V. W. Ruttan (eds.), Induced Innovation: Technology Institutions and Development (1978), pp. 13–43.
8. D. Acemoglu, ‘Why Do New Technologies Complement Skills? Directed Technical Change and Wage Inequality’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 4, 1998, pp. 1055–89.
9. A. B. Atkinson and J. E. Stiglitz, ‘A New View of Technological Change’, Economic Journal, 79, 315, 1969, pp. 573–8.
10. P. M. Romer, ‘The Origins of Endogenous Growth’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 1, 1994, pp. 3–22.
11. P. Aghion and P. Howitt, ‘A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction’, Econometrica, 60, 2, 1992, pp. 323–51.
12. R. R. Nelson and S. G. Winter, ‘Growth Theory From an Evolutionary Perspective: The Differential Productivity Puzzle’, American Economic Review, 65, 2, 1975, pp. 338–44.
13. T. F. Bresnahan and M. Traitenberg, ‘General Purpose Technologies: "Engines of Growth"?’, Journal of Econometrics, 65, 1995, pp. 83–108.
14. R. Lipsey, C. Bekar, and K. Carlaw, ‘What Requires Explanation?’, in E. Helpman (ed.), General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth (1998), pp. 15–54.
15. P. A. David, ‘The Dynamo and the Computer: A Historical Perspective on the Modern Productivity Paradox’, American Economic Review, 80, 2, 1990, pp. 355–61.
Volume II: Innovation and Competition: The Schumpeterian Legacy
16. Z. J. Acs and D. B. Audretsch, ‘Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis’, American Economic Review, 78, 4, 1998, pp. 678–90.
17. W. J. Baumol, ‘Entrepreneurial Enterprises, Large Established Firms and Other Components of the Free-Market Growth Machine’, Small Business Economics, 23, 2004, pp. 9–21.
18. R. R. Nelson, ‘The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research’, Journal of Political Economy, 67, 3, 1959, pp. 297–306.
19. J. Cantwell and B. Andersen, ‘A Statistical Analysis of Corporate Technological Leadership Historically’, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 4, 3, 1996, pp. 211–34.
20. S. Haneda and H. Odagiri, ‘Appropriation of Returns from Technological Assets and the Values of Patents and R&D in Japanese High-Tech Firms’, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 7, 4, 1998, pp. 303–21.
21. F. M. Scherer, ‘Research and Development Resource Allocation Under Rivalry’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 81, 3, 1967, pp. 359–94.
22. P. Dasgupta and J. E. Stiglitz, ‘Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity’, The Economic Journal, 90, 358, 1980, pp. 266–93.
23. P. Stoneman and N. Ireland, ‘The Role of Supply Factors in the Diffusion of New Process Technology’, Economic Journal, 93, 1983, pp. 66–78.
24. C. Antonelli, ‘Investment and Adoption in Advanced Telecommunications’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 20, 1993, pp. 227–45.
25. M. L. Katz and C. Shapiro, ‘Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities’, Journal of Political Economy, 94, 41, 1986, pp. 822–41.
26. C. Antonelli, ‘Diffusion as a Process of Creative Adoption’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 2006, pp. 211–26.
27. K. Pavitt, ‘Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory’, Research Policy, 13, 1984, pp. 343–73.
28. F. Malerba and L. Orsenigo, ‘Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 1995, pp. 47–65.
29. W. J. Abernathy and K. B. Clark, ‘Mapping the Winds of Creative Destruction’, Research Policy, 14, 1985, pp. 3–22.
30. R. M. Henderson and K. B. Clark, ‘Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 1990, pp. 9–30.
Volume III: Innovation and Knowledge: The Arrovian Legacy
31. N. Rosenberg, ‘Karl Marx and the Economic Role of Science’, Journal of Political Economy, 82, 4, pp. 713–28.
32. K. J. Arrow, ‘Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention’, in R. R. Nelson (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (1962), pp. 609–25.
33. P. Dasgupta and P. A. David, ‘Towards a New Economics of Science’, Research Policy, 23, 1994, pp. 487–521.
34. A. Pakes and Z. Griliches, ‘Patents and R&D at the Firm Level’, Economic Letters, 5, 1980, pp. 377–81.
35. P. Mohnen, J. Mairesse, and M. Dagenais, ‘Innovativity: A Comparison Across Seven European Countries’, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15, 4/5, 2006, pp. 391–413.
36. A. B. Jaffe, ‘Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms’ Patents, Profits and Market Value’, American Economic Review, 76, 5, 1986, pp. 984–1001.
37. Z. Griliches, ‘The Search for R&D Spillovers’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94, 1992, pp. S29–S47.
38. M. Feldman, ‘The New Economics of Innovation, Spillovers and Agglomeration: A Review of Empirical Studies’, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8, 1999, pp. 5–25.
39. F. Malerba, ‘Learning by Firms and Incremental Technical Change’, Economic Journal, 102, 413, 1992, pp. 845–59.
40. K. J. Arrow, ‘Classificatory Notes on the Production and Transmission of Technical Knowledge’, American Economic Review, 59, 2, 1969, pp. 29–35.
41. E. Mansfield, M. Schwartz, and S. Wagner, ‘Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Study’, Economic Journal, 91, 364, 1981, pp. 907–18.
42. W. M. Cohen and D. A. Levinthal, ‘Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 1, 1990, pp. 128–52.
43. R. R. Nelson, ‘The Role of Knowledge in R&D Efficiency’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97, 3, 1982, pp. 453–70.
44. F. A. Hayek, ‘The Use of Knowledge in Society’, American Economic Review, 35, 4, pp. 519–30.
45. E. Von Hippel, ‘The Dominant Role of Users in the Scientific Instrument Innovation Process’, Research Policy, 5, 1976, pp. 212–39.
46. D. J. Teece, ‘Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy’, Research Policy, 15, 1986, pp. 285–305.
47. A. Arora and A. Gambardella, ‘The Changing Technology of Technical Change: General and Abstract Knowledge and the Division of Innovative Labor’, Research Policy, 23, 1994, pp. 523–32.
48. P. P. Patrucco, ‘The Emergence of Technology Systems: Knowledge Production and Distribution in the Case of the Emilian Plastics District’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29, 2005, pp. 37–56.
49. A. Arora, ‘Licensing Tacit Knowledge: Intellectual Property Rights and the Market for Know-How’, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 4, 1995, pp. 41–59.
50. M. Trajtenberg, R. Henderson, and A. Jaffe, ‘University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window on the Basicness of Invention’, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 5, 1995, pp. 19–50.
51. J. D. Adams, ‘Learning, Internal Research, and Spillovers’, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15, 2006, pp. 5–36.
52. C. Freeman, ‘Networks of Innovators: A Synthesis of Research Issues’, Research Policy, 20, 1991, pp. 499–514.
53. P. Patel and K. Pavitt, ‘National Innovation Systems: Why They are Important and How They Might be Measured and Compared’, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 3, 1994, pp. 77–95.
54. P. A. Gompers and J. Lerner, ‘The Venture Capital Revolution’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 2, 2001, pp. 145–68.
55. C. Antonelli, ‘The Business Governance of Localized Knowledge: An Information Economics Approach to the Economics of Knowledge’, Industry and Innovation, 13, 3, 2006, pp. 227–61.
Volume IV: Innovation and Complexity
56. Z. Griliches, ‘Hybrid Corn: An Exploration in the Economics of Technological Change’, Econometrica, 25, 4, 1957, pp. 501–22.
57. W. J. Utterback and J. M. Abernathy, ‘A Dynamic Model of Process and Product Innovation’, Omega, 3, 6, 1975, pp. 639–56.
58. L. L. Soete and R. Turner, ‘Technology Diffusion and the Rate of Technical Change’, Economic Journal, 94, 375, 1984, pp. 612–23.
59. H. A. Simon, ‘Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations’, American Economic Review, 69, 4, 1979, pp. 493–512.
60. C. Antonelli, ‘A Failure Inducement Model of Research and Development Expenditure: Italian Evidence from the Early 1980s’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 12, 1989, pp. 159–80.
61. R. R. Nelson and S. G. Winter, ‘In Search of a Useful Theory of Innovation’, Research Policy, 6, 1977, pp. 36–76.
62. B. J. Loasby, ‘The Organization of Capabilities’, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 35, 1998, pp. 139–60.
63. G. Dosi, ‘Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technological Change’, Research Policy, 11, 1982, pp. 147–62.
64. G. Silverberg, G. Dosi, and L. Orsenigo, ‘Innovation Diversity and Diffusion: A Self-Organisation Model’, Economic Journal, 98, 393, 1988, pp. 1032–54.
65. J. B. Rosser, ‘On the Complexities of Complex Economic Dynamics’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13, 4, 1999, pp. 169–92.
66. J. Foster, ‘From Simplistic to Complex Systems in Economics’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29, 2005, pp. 873–92.
67. S. N. Durlauf, ‘Complexity and Empirical Economics’, Economic Journal, 115, 2005, pp. F225–43.
68. P. A. David, ‘Why are Institutions the "Carriers of History"?: Path Dependence and the Evolution of Conventions, Organizations and Institutions’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 5, 2, 1994, pp. 205–20.
69. B. Arthur, ‘Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns and Lock-In by Historical Events’, Economic Journal, 99, 394, 1989, pp. 116–31.
70. P. A. David, ‘Clio and the Economics of QWERTY’, American Economic Review, 75, 2, 1985, pp. 332–7.
71. D. C. North, ‘Some Fundamental Puzzles in Economic History’, in W. B. Arthur, S. N. Durlauf, and D. Lane (eds.), The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II (1997), pp. 223–37.
72. J. Mokyr, ‘Punctuated Equilibria and Technological Progress’, American Economic Review, 80, 2, 1990, pp. 350–4.
73. J. S. Metcalfe, J. Foster, and R. Ramlogan, ‘Adaptive Economic Growth’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30, 2006, pp. 7–32.
74. C. Antonelli, ‘The Economics of Path-Dependence in Industrial Organization’, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15, 1997, pp. 643–75.
75. C. Antonelli, ‘The System Dynamics of Collective Knowledge: From Gradualism and Saltationism to Punctuated Change’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 62, 2007, pp. 215–36.
76. P. Krugman, ‘Complex Landscapes in Economic Geography’, American Economic Review, 84, 2, 1994, pp. 412–16.
77. D. A. Lane and R. Maxfield, ‘Foresight Complexity and Strategy’, in W. B. Arthur, S. N. Durlauf, and D. A. Lane (eds.), The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II (1997), pp. 169–98.
78. K. J. Arrow, ‘Increasing Returns: Historiographic Issues and Path Dependence’, European Journal of History of Economic Thought, 7, 2, 2000, pp. 171–80.
Biography
Edited by Antonelli Cristiano






