This book describes the user-focused action evaluation approach for evaluating health programmes policies and changes. It shows that evidence for making decisions can be gathered using a broader range of methods than is usually recognised in healthcare. In asking 'evaluation for whom and for what?' the book defines validity of evidence in relation to usefulness as well as in terms of whether systematic methods were followed. Managers practitioners policy makers researchers and students will find this a practical and readable book. It gives the tools to make sense of an evaluation quickly as well as guidance for carrying one out and ensuring that evaluators gather evidence which can be used for better informed decisions.
Table of Contents
The potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical practice guidelines. Developing guidelines. Economics and clinical practice guidelines. The legal status of clinical practice guidelines. Using clinical practice guidelines. The mental health technology appraisal and clinical guidelines programmes of the national insitute for clinical excellence. Mental health guidelines development in Scotland. The national collaborating centre for mental health. Using mental health guidelines in the NHS: views from a specialist mental health trust. Using mental health guidelines in primary care: the example of depression management.