Measuring Statistical Evidence Using Relative Belief  book cover
SAVE
$21.00
1st Edition

Measuring Statistical Evidence Using Relative Belief




ISBN 9781482242799
Published June 23, 2015 by Chapman and Hall/CRC
250 Pages - 8 B/W Illustrations

 
SAVE ~ $21.00
was $105.00
USD $84.00

Prices & shipping based on shipping country


Preview

Book Description

A Sound Basis for the Theory of Statistical Inference

Measuring Statistical Evidence Using Relative Belief provides an overview of recent work on developing a theory of statistical inference based on measuring statistical evidence. It shows that being explicit about how to measure statistical evidence allows you to answer the basic question of when a statistical analysis is correct.

The book attempts to establish a gold standard for how a statistical analysis should proceed. It first introduces basic features of the overall approach, such as the roles of subjectivity, objectivity, infinity, and utility in statistical analyses. It next discusses the meaning of probability and the various positions taken on probability. The author then focuses on the definition of statistical evidence and how it should be measured. He presents a method for measuring statistical evidence and develops a theory of inference based on this method. He also discusses how statisticians should choose the ingredients for a statistical problem and how these choices are to be checked for their relevance in an application.

Table of Contents

Statistical Problems
Introduction
Statistical Problems
Statistical Models
Infinity and Continuity in Statistics
The Principle of Empirical Criticism
The Concept of Utility
The Principle of Frequentism
Statistical Inferences
Example
Concluding Comments

Probability
Introduction
Principle of Insufficient Reason
Subjective Probability
Relative Frequency Probability
Concluding Comments

Characterizing Statistical Evidence
Introduction
Pure Likelihood Inference
Sufficiency, Ancillarity and Completeness
P-values and Confidence
Bayesian Inferences
Fiducial Inference
Concluding Comments

Measuring Statistical Evidence Using Relative Belief
Introduction
Relative Belief Ratios and Evidence
Other Proposed Measures of Evidence
Measuring the Strength of the Evidence
Inference Based on Relative Belief Ratios
Measuring the Bias in the Evidence
Properties of Relative Belief Inferences
Concluding Comments
Appendix

Choosing and Checking the Model and Prior
Introduction
Choosing the Model
Choosing the Prior
Checking the Ingredients
Checking the Model
Checking the Prior
Modifying the Prior
Concluding Comments

Conclusions

Appendix: The Definition of Density

Bibliography

Index

...
View More

Author(s)

Biography

Michael Evans is a professor in the Department of Statistics at the University of Toronto. His research focuses on statistical inference, particularly a theory of inference based on the concept of relative belief. He is an associate editor of Bayesian Analysis and a former president of the Statistical Society of Canada.

Featured Author Profiles

Author - Michael John Evans
Author

Michael John Evans

Professor, University of Toronto
Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Learn more about Michael John Evans »

Reviews

"This creative book by Michael Evans describes not only a new way to measure the strength of evidence but also a system of statistical data analysis on the basis of that measure. That system, specifically designed in response to problems with conventional frequentist and Bayesian statistics, has advantages over previous solutions to those problems. The core of the system is its concept of the degree of relative belief in a hypothesis.
The author defines relative belief in a hypothesis of positive prior probability as the ratio of the posterior probability that the hypothesis is true to the prior probability that it is true. The relative belief in a simple null hypothesis of 0 prior probability is then defined as the relative belief in a hypothesis of positive prior probability in the limit as it shrinks toward the simple hypothesis…. In short, Evans makes concrete recommendations for evidential data analysis based on informed reflection on Lindley's paradox, the logical coherence principle, and the conditional probability principle."
—David R. Bickel, in Mathematical Reviews Clippings, December 2017

"This book presents a comprehensive survey of the literature on measuring statistical evidence based on relative beliefs…This book integrates recent developments into a coursebook format with a pedagogical introduction to the area. The author is a main contributor in the field and the book systematically assembles material conveying his findings and his views on statistics as a whole…The first three chapters provide the readers with a basic introduction to the foundations of probability and statistics viewed through the lens of the author’s school of thought…The second part of the book is devoted to the measurement of statistical evidence based on relative beliefs…Though the first (overview) part of the book does not presuppose much background knowledge, my feeling is that a sound grasp of the subject will help the reader come away with a solid understanding and interpretation of this tour. On the other hand, the main theoretical part does not require many technical prerequisites and is accessible to students having a basic background."
—Markus Bibinger, University of Marburg, in Journal of the American Statistical Association, Volume 111, 2016

"… a fascinating book, in that it defines a coherent and original approach to the vexing question of assessing and measuring evidence in a statistical problem. And spells out most vividly the issue of prior checking. … the book is a great opportunity to discuss this approach and to oppose it to potential alternatives, hopefully generating incoming papers and talks."
Christian Robert on his blog Xi'an’s Og, July 2015

"The book is a pleasure to read and presents a really unique view of statistics as a whole and how to measure evidence in particular. … this is one of the most important books written recently on the foundations of statistics, providing a modern and logical perspective on the reasons for good Bayesian statistical practice."
David Nott, National University of Singapore