1st Edition
The Relationship between Rhetoric and Terrorist Violence
Studies have demonstrated that choices in the use of language convey information that goes beyond the content of the words themselves. In many cases, how something is said matters as much as what is said. Using techniques collectively referred to as linguistic content analysis, researchers have studied topics ranging from how to identify if individuals are lying, to whether there are particular characteristics associated with leaders who take their nations to war. This book presents findings from a research effort funded by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Science and Technology Directorate, which examined whether linguistic content analysis can indicate whether groups will engage in terrorist violence. Specifically, this project brought together several researchers who have developed manual and automated coding systems to analyse documents issued by Central al Qa’ida and al Qa’ida in the Arabian Peninsula, and two non-terrorist comparison groups. The intention has been to test whether linguistic content analysis can first, distinguish the language of terrorist groups from that of non-terrorist groups and second, provide indicators of specific terrorist attacks.
This book was originally published as a Special Issue of Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict.
1. The relationship between rhetoric and terrorist violence: Introduction Allison G. Smith – U.S. Department of Homeland Security 2. Using computer analyses to identify language style and aggressive intent: The secret life of function words James W. Pennebaker – University of Texas at Austin 3. Violent frames in action Antonio Sanfilippo, Liam McGrath & Paul Whitney – Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 4. The rhetoric of Islamic activism: A DICTION study Roderick P. Hart & Colene J. Lind – University of Texas at Austin 5. Leadership, terrorism, and the use of violence Margaret G. Hermann & Azamat Sakiev – Syracuse University 6. Anticipating attacks from the operational codes of terrorist groups Stephen G. Walker – Arizona State University 7. Scoring motive imagery in documents from four Middle East opposition groups David G. Winter -- University of Michigan 8. The hidden implications of radical group rhetoric: Integrative complexity and terrorism Lucian Gideon Conway III, Laura Janelle Gornick, Shannon Houck, Kirsten Hands Towgood & Kathrene R. Conway – University of Montana 9. Scoring universal values in the study of terrorist groups and leaders Peter Suedfeld & Jelena Brcic – University of British Columbia 10. The terrorist rhetorical style and its consequences for understanding terrorist violence Lucian Gideon Conway III & Kathrene R. Conway – University of Montana
Biography
Allison Smith, Ph.D., is a social scientist at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Science and Technology (S&T) Directorate, where she manages social and behavioural science research efforts. The views expressed in this publication may not represent the views or opinions of the Department of Homeland Security.
