1st Edition

Globalizing the Prehistory of Japan Language, genes and civilisation

By Ann Kumar Copyright 2009
    218 Pages
    by Routledge

    220 Pages
    by Routledge

    This iconoclastic work on the prehistory of Japan and of South East Asia challenges entrenched views on the origins of Japanese society and identity. The social changes that took place in Japan in the time-period when the Jomon culture was replaced by the Yayoi culture were of exceptional magnitude, going far beyond those of the so-called Neolithic Revolution in other parts of the world.  They included not only a new way of life based on wet-rice agriculture but also the introduction of metalworking in both bronze and iron, and furthermore a new architecture functionally and ritually linked to rice cultivation, a new religion, and a hierarchical society characterized by a belief in the divinity of the ruler. Because of its immense and enduring impact the Yayoi period has generally been seen as the very foundation of Japanese civilization and identity. In contrast to the common assumption that all the Yayoi innovations came from China and Korea, this work combines exciting new scientific evidence from such different fields as rice genetics, DNA and historical linguistics to show that the major elements of Yayoi civilization actually came, not from the north, but from the south. 

    1. Myths and Mental Space  2. The Prehistories of Japan and Indonesia  3. The Evidence of the Rice  4. The Evidence of the Teeth and Skulls  5. DNA, Ancient and Modern  6. The Evidence of Language: the Words that Tell the Story  7. Royal Rice Rituals and the Cultivated Prince Conclusion

    Biography

    Ann Kumar is Professor in the Faculty of Asian Studies, Australian National University, and former Vice-President of the Australian Academy of the Humanities.

    'This book succeeds in forcing us to reconsider the possible long-distance
    influences on early Japan as well as overturning the assumption that Java was always a
    cultural recipient, whether of Austronesians or Indianization, and it constitutes a strong
    case for more systematic Metal-Age archaeology on Java and its surrounding islands.'        - DORIAN Q. FULLER University College London.