1st Edition

Twisted Rails, Sunken Ships The Rhetoric of Nineteenth Century Steamboat and Railroad Accident Investigation Reports, 1833-1879

By John Brockman Copyright 2004
    204 Pages
    by Routledge

    286 Pages
    by Routledge

    Contemporary disaster investigation reports into the Shuttle, Three Mile Island, or the World Trade Centre did not happen by chance, but were the result of an evolution of the discourse communities involved with investigating technological accidents. The relationships of private companies, coroners, outside experts, and government investigators all had to be developed and experimented with before a genre of investigation reports could exist. This book is the story of the evolution of these investigation discourse communities in published reports written between 1833 and 1879. Using the reports generated by seven different accidents on railroads and steamboats between 1833 and 1876, it is possible to observe the changes in how these reports interacted and changed over the course of the nineteenth century: The Explosion of the Steamboat New England in the Connecticut River, 1833; The Explosion of the Locomotive Engine Richmond near Reading Pennsylvania, 1844; The Explosion of the Steam Boat Moselle in Cincinatti, 1838; The Camden and Amboy Railroad Collision in Burlington, New Jersey, 1855; The Gasconade Bridge Collapse on the Pacific Railroad in Missouri, 1855; The Eastern Railroad Collision in Revere, Massachusetts, 1871; The Ashtabula Railroad Bridge Collapse in Ohio, 1876

    Introduction: The Dance of Nineteenth Century Steamboat and Railroad Accident Investigation Reports

     Two 1911 ICC Reports
     Shifts in America Affecting Accident Investigation Reports
     Three Shifts in the Discourse Community

    PART ONE: USING SCIENCE AS A CORPORATE DEFENSE

     Chapter 1: The Collaboration of Science and the Corporations Takes Center Stage While the Coroner's Jury is Befuddled by Complexity
     The Accident-The Explosion of the Steam Boat New England, October 9, 1883
     The Coroner's Jury Investigation
     The Company Investigation Report Exonerates Its Actions Using Science
     Establishing a Scientific Ethos for the Investigation Report
     Dispositio (Arrangement) as a Means of Persuasion in the Investigation Report
     "Outside Experts" Give Their Findings . . . But Not Very Persuasively Other "Outside Experts" Offer Their Critical Comments, But Much Later
     In the End

    Chapter 2: Science for Sale
     The Accident-Explosion of the Locomotive Engine Richmond near Reading, Penna. on the 2nd of September 1844
     The Coroner's Jury Verdict-Act of God or an Act of Man
     The Shaky Scientific Ethos of Dionysus Lardner
     Needing to Present Both Sides when Lardner Declaims
     Committee on Science and the Arts Report
     In the End

    PART TWO: PUBLICITY, POLITICAL PRESSURE, AND EMOTIONAL INVOLVEMENT BY AUTHORS TRANSFORM DISASTER INVESTIGATIONS

     Chapter 3: Publicity, Politics, and Emotions Enter the Investigation Constellation-The Steamboat Moselle Explosion, Spring 1838  The Steamboat Moselle Explosion on the Cincinnati Waterfront Cincinnati in the 1830s: Frontier Law and Order
     Political Control of the Investigation Locke's Highly Charged Personal Emotional Involvement in the Investigation
     How Locke Used Silliman's Report
     The Beginning of a New Approach to Accident Investigation
     In the End

    Chapter 4: What Happens When the Scientific Ethos is Missing in Investigation Reports: The Camden and Amboy Railroad Disaster, 29 of August 1855
     Railroad Dangers
     The Joint Companies (the Camden and Amboy Railroad and the Delaware and Raritan Canal) and Commodore Robert F. Stockton
     The Coroner's Jury Verdict
     The Joint Companies Try to Exonerate their Actions but Meet with Disdain
     The Franklin Institute Scientists Offer a Sermon, Not Science The Stockton-Van Rensselaer Controversy
     In the End

    Chapter 5: The Gasconade Bridge Accident, November 2, 1855
     A Celebration with Political Effects
     Railroad Truss Bridges
     Unfinished Bridges were Routinely Used
     The Accident
     The Coroner's Inquest
     The Press Weighs In
     The Company's Report-Does Not Fully Exonerate the Company
     Henry Kayser-A Critical Scientific Voice of the Company
     Julius Adams's Rebuttal
     In the End

    PART THREE: THE ANTEBELLUM PERIOD OF DISASTER INVESTIGATION: TRANSFORMATION ENDS AND A CONSTELLATION OF ROLES AND REPORTS BECOMES NORMAL
     The Role of the Newspapers in the Investigative Process
     International Influences in the United States Investigative Process

    Chapter 6: The Eastern Railroad Accident at Revere, Massachusetts, August 26, 1871
     The Accident
     Instant Analysis, The Railroad Gazette, September 2, 1871
     Coroner's Jury Verdict, September 10
     Report of the Committee of the Directors, October 20, 1871, and "Justice" in the American Railroad Times, October 21 to December 23
     The Massachusetts Railroad Commission Report, January 1872
     Charles Francis Adams, Jr.'s Account of the Revere Accident, Atlantic Monthly, January 1876
     In the End

    Chapter 7: The Ashtabula Railroad Disaster, December 29, 1876- The State and the Professionals Take Over
     Four Variations on the Tried-and-True Howe Truss Design
     The Accident
     The Investigations
     Three Unique Investigations
     In the End-Move toward Legislative Action

    Chapter 8: Notes on Railroad Accidents
     A Railroad Philosopher
     Contemporary Reviews of Notes on Railroad Accidents
     Rhetorical Element One: "Thrilling Incidents"
     Rhetorical Element Two: "Accident Taxonomy"
     Rhetorical Element Three: "Statistics"
     Rhetorical Element Four: "Scientific Analysis"
     The Impact of Notes on Railroad Accidents

    Glossary
     Index

    Biography

    Professor R. John Brockmann has been a member of the English Department, Concentration in Business and Technical Writing, University of Delaware, for 20 years. He received the Jay R. Gould Award for Excellence in Teaching technical communication from the Society for Technical Communication in 2003. He was elected a Fellow of the Society for Technical Communication in 1995, and received the Joseph T. Rigo Award, 1986 from the Association of Computing Machinery, Special Interest Group for Documentation of Computers (ACM SIGDOC), for his significant contributions to the knowledge and understanding of software technical writing.