A Tale of Two Parties
Living Amongst Democrats and Republicans Since 1952
- Available for pre-order. Item will ship after March 2, 2021
Different groups of Americans have different interests in politics. The Democratic and Republican parties are supposed to aggregate and articulate this interest in government after campaigning in elections. Many observers believe that both parties performed their interest aggregation and articulation functions better in the past than in the present. A Tale of Two Parties: Living Amongst Democrats and Republicans Since 1952 tackles the following objectives:
• How the United States society has changed over the last six decades in terms of occupation, education, regional growth, urbanization, religion, ethnicity, and ideology;
• Summarize how the Democratic and Republican parties have shifted over time in representing these social groups—thus differing in aggregating their interests;
• To indicate how the two major U.S. parties have articulated the political interests of their social bases in congressional voting in the House of Representatives over time;
• Assess the prospects for interest aggregation and articulation by governments over the next decade.
A Tale of Two Parties: Living Amongst Democrats and Republicans Since 1952 will have a wide and enthusiastic readership among political scientists and researchers of American politics, campaigns and elections, and voting and elections.
Table of Contents
1. Stability and Change in the American Polity
2. Partisan Identities
3. Party Organization and Social Groupings
4. Region: Once Primary, Now Secondary
5. Income: Slight, Steady, and Increasing Difference
6. Urbanization: Shifting Effects
7. Education: Incremental Reversal
8. Religion: Important and in Flux
9. Ethnicity: Dwindling Whites
10. Ideology: Partisan Cause or Partisan Effect?
11. Reviewing the Survey Data
12. Baneful Effects
13. Donald Trump’s Last Hurrah
Appendix A: Equal Group Appeal Formula
Appendix B: Party Base Concentration Formula
Appendix C: Poll Questions Asking Respondents’ Ideology, 1935-1969
Kenneth Janda is Payson S. Wild Professor Emeritus at Northwestern University. He is co-founder of the international journal Party Politics; co-author of The Challenge of Democracy: American Government in Global Politics, 15th Ed. (2021); author of Party Systems and Country Governance (2011); and The Emperor and the Peasant (2018). He received the Samuel J. Eldersveld Lifetime Achievement Award from the American Political Science Association’s Political Parties and Organizations Section in 2000, and the APSA’s Frank J. Goodnow Award for service to the discipline and profession in 2009.
"Kenneth Janda inventively examines survey data to uncover the extent to which Republicans and Democrats today are different from those in the 1950s. He documents changes as to how different groups identify with the parties as well as in which groups constitute the base of each party. Janda presents the numbers, but then he delightfully adds his own perspectives on these seven decades of politics. As to be expected, the answer is that there has been change in some of the sociological differences between the parties, but the surprise is how many have stayed the same."
Herbert Weisberg, Professor Emeritus, Ohio State University
"Drawing upon social identity theory, Janda helps us understand why – at a time when the policy differences between the two parties have never been more stark – their support bases are driven more by social identity than by policy. With analysis covering the period from 1952 to 2020, the already-interesting story is made even more interesting with touches of autobiography and analogies from -- believe it or not -- the world of sports. In an era marked by hyperpartisanship, extreme polarization, and political tribalism, this is an entertaining and highly informative book that should be read by all serious students of American party politics."
Robert Harmel, Professor, Texas A&M
"A pioneer of the modern social sciences offers a remarkable tale of how American political parties have developed over the past 17 presidential elections. He draws on his own experiences as a citizen, political scientist, student, and mentor, as well as analyses of nearly 70 years of data. Charting the evolving composition of the parties, Professor Janda shows how the social bases of the parties have changed and how social features, rather than ideology, have come to define the Democrats and Republicans. While this raises questions about how well responsible party government works, Professor Janda ends with an optimistic view of the future. This book is a social science masterpiece from which we will all learn."
James Druckman, Northwestern University