1st Edition

Action-Research in Community Development

Edited By Ray Lees, George Smith Copyright 1975
216 Pages
by Routledge

216 Pages
by Routledge

First published in 1975, Action-Research in Community Development discusses experiences of people who worked on the central government sponsored Community Development Project (CDP). Announced with a flourish in 1969 as part of Britain’s ‘Poverty Programme’, CDP represented a new initiative in British social policy. It was described by the Home Office as ‘a radical experiment in community... Read more

Introduction

Part 1: The national community development project

1. CDP: An official view
Home Office, 1971

2. The history and early development of CDP
Marjorie Mayo

3. The context of the twelve project areas
Joan Payne and Kleri Smith

4. Extracts from the inter-project report

Part 2: Establishing local projects

5. Early stages in North Tyneside CDP
David Corkey

6. Expectations of a local project
Alex Mackay

7. The action-research relationship
Ray Lees

Part 3: Action in the local areas

8. Working with tenants: two case studies
John Foster

9. The leasehold problem in Saltley
Geoff Green

10. The Hillfields information centre: a case study
Nick Bond

11. Welfare rights: an experimental approach
Jonathan Bradshaw

12. A note on community education
Eric Midwinter

13. Curriculum development and the community approach
Ray Lees

14. Social needs of an immigrant population
Morag McGrath

15. Job-getting and job-holding
Glyncorrwg CDP

16. Mobility deprivation
Glyncorrwg CDP

Part 4: Action and research strategies

17. CDP and the urban programme
Richard Batley and John Edwards

18. Community Development as a process of emergence
Samuel H. Bailie

19. The flaw in the pluralist heaven – changing strategies in the Coventry CDP
John Benington

20. Action-research: experimental social administration?
George Smith

Biography

Ray Lees

George Smith

Review of the first publication:

‘It is essential reading, not only for anyone interested in the problems of organizing community development within statutory agencies, but for those who wish to understand the decline in the Home Office’s enthusiasm for CDP.’

Community Development Journal, Volume 11, Issue 1