An Ancient Theory of Religion : Euhemerism from Antiquity to the Present book cover
SAVE
$36.00
1st Edition

An Ancient Theory of Religion
Euhemerism from Antiquity to the Present





ISBN 9781138848931
Published December 19, 2016 by Routledge
202 Pages

 
SAVE ~ $36.00
was $180.00
USD $144.00

Prices & shipping based on shipping country


Preview

Book Description

An Ancient Theory of Religion examines a theory of religion put forward by Euhemerus of Messene (late 4th—early 3rd century BCE) in his lost work Sacred Inscription, and shows not only how and why euhemerism came about but also how it was— and still is—used.



By studying the utilization of the theory in different periods—from the Graeco-Roman world to Late Antiquity, and from the Renaissance to the twenty-first century—this book explores the reception of the theory in diverse literary works. In so doing, it also unpacks the different adoptions and misrepresentations of Euhemerus’s work according to the diverse agendas of the authors and scholars who have employed his theory. In the process, certain questions are raised: What did Euhemerus actually claim? How has his theory of the origins of belief in gods been used? How can modern scholarship approach and interpret his take on religion? When referring to ‘euhemerism,’ whose version are we employing? An Ancient Theory of Religion assumes no prior knowledge of euhemerism and will be of interest to scholars working in classical reception, religious studies, and early Christian studies.

Table of Contents

Acknowledgments



Introduction: Why Study Euhemerism?



1. Euhemerus’s Euhemerism



2. Before Euhemerus



3. Returning to the Sources



4. Euhemerism and Atheism



5. Euhemerus, Divine Kingship, and Irony



6. Citing the Citations: Anti–‘Pagan’ Euhemerism and Identity Formation



7. Turning the Tables: Anti–Christian Euhemerism in Celsus



8. Seeing ‘Euhemerism’ Everywhere



Afterword: On the Use and Abuse of a Theory



Index

...
View More

Author(s)

Biography

Nickolas P. Roubekas is a postdoctoral research fellow at the School of Ancient Languages and Text Studies, North-West University, South Africa. He received his Ph.D. in Religious Studies from the Aristotle University, Greece, and held research and teaching positions at the University of South Africa and the University of Aberdeen, UK.

Reviews

"Nickolas Roubekas is to be congratulated for producing an eminently readable and carefully researched account of Euhemerus’ theory and its variegated transformations throughout the centuries, highlighting biases, intentional or unintentional omissions, modifications and manipulations of the Messenian’s work. The fruits of his integrated approach, effortlessly communicating between classical scholarship and religious studies, are heartily recommended to the students and scholars of these disciplines."
-
Juraj Franek, Journal of Cognitive Historiography

"Nickolas Roubekas rediscovers the long shadow cast by Euhemerus of Messene over the history of conceptualizing the divine from Hellenistic times to the present. While building on classical studies on Euhemerus and his reception, Roubekas presents scholarship on religion with a timely appropriation of Euhemerus and the discourse he elicited on the origins of gods and the divine for the contemporary study of religion.  This study of Euhemerus provides the necessary groundworkfor retrieving the discursive processes of manufacturing divinity that lie at the foundation of the history of European Christianity."
Professor Gerhard van den Heever, University of South Africa

"This book provides an important contribution to the understanding of Euhemerism ... Nickolas Roubekas provides a rigorous study both of Euhemerism in its original sense, and the cultural history of its reception, for an audience of both Classicists and students of religion ... ‘Whose Euhemerism?’ is the right question to pose, as the conclusion states (p. 182). "
-Miguel Herrero de Jáuregui, Acta Classica

"This short and focused book is recommended for historians of religion who are interested in the premodern roots of the compara>tive category of religion as it was deployed in the early days of the discipline."
-Brian Collins, Religious Studies Review, Rice University