1st Edition

Anticipation and Medicine A Critical Analysis of the Science, Praxis and Perversion of Evidence Based Healthcare

By Owen Dempsey Copyright 2019
152 Pages
by Routledge

152 Pages
by Routledge

152 Pages
by Routledge

Anticipation in Medicine: A Critical Analysis of the Science, Praxis and Perversion of Evidence Based Healthcare looks at an aspect of healthcare rarely addressed: how the capitalist interest in diagnosis and treatment impacts upon the patient and, by extension, the system of healthcare itself. Using Lacanian structures of discourse, Dr. Owen Dempsey critiques the praxis of scientific Evidence... Read more

Introduction

1. The care paradox

2. Science and politics

3. Science and politics - a case history: breast cancer screening

4. Language, harm and overdiagnosis- a case history: the real cancer paradox

5. Politics and consciousness

6. Subjectivity, care-labour and Lacan's structures of discourse

7. Subjectivities of care- a case history: alienating identities

8. The opportunity costs of neoliberal pragmatist anticipatory care- a case history: A molecular genetic 'signature' for cancer risk

9. Two impossibilities: burnout and depersonalisation of care-giving

10. Neoliberal pragmatism incites perversion: the capitalist discourse

11. The Oedipus complex and perverse care-provision: a case history

12. The biopolitics of anticipatory care: Spinoza and the prohibition of health

Conclusion

 

Biography

Owen Dempsey is a medical doctor specialising in the care of marginalised communities including asylum seekers, refugees, and the homeless. Most recently he has focussed on substance and alcohol addiction in his work. He is also undertaking research into the practice and effects of EBM. He uses a discursive psycho-social approach to critique the effects of anticipatory diagnostic technologies through the relationship between Evidence Based Healthcare and capitalism.

"Dempsey’s approach to the perils of evidence-based medicine is novel, and makes for an interesting read. The majority of the points he makes are valid, and are the same ones many others make, though they may start from a different place philosophically." - Mark K. Huntington, Family Medicine