Assimilation Versus Separation: Joseph the Administrator and the Polit

Description

How to behave in the diaspora has been a central problem for Jews over the ages. They have debated whether to assimilate by adopting local customs or whether to remain a God-centered people loyal to their temporal rulers but maintaining the peculiar customs that separated them from their host nations. The question not only of survival, but of the basis for survival, is also a central problem in... Read more

How to behave in the diaspora has been a central problem for Jews over the ages. They have debated whether to assimilate by adopting local customs or whether to remain a God-centered people loyal to their temporal rulers but maintaining the peculiar customs that separated them from their host nations. The question not only of survival, but of the basis for survival, is also a central problem in the Joseph stories of the Book of Genesis. The work shows its readers the grand alternatives of Judaism, instilled in two larger-than-life figures, so its readers can reassess for themselves the road Judaism did not take, and understand why Joseph though admirable in many respects, is left out of the rest of the Bible.The question is answered through the stories about how Joseph, the son of Jacob, saved his people/family from famine by becoming a high-ranking administrator to Pharaoh. By analyzing his behavior to the people over whom he exercises power, Joseph lords it over his brothers, grieves his father, takes lands from Egyptian farmers, and engages in forced deportation. Wildavsky explains why Joseph-the-assimilator is replaced in the Book of Exodus by Moses-the-lawgiver. The book ends by demonstrating that Joseph and Moses are, and are undoubtedly meant to be exact opposites.As in his earlier book on The Nursing Father: Moses as a Political Leader, Wildavsky combines analysis of political and administrative leadership with both traditional and modern study of texts: thematic linkages via plot, grammar, dreams, poetry, and religious doctrine. Thus the chapter on "Joseph the Administrator" is preceded by a chapter on Joseph as The Dream Lord" and followed by an analysis and explanation of why Jacob's obscure blessings to his sons are more like curses. Always the emphasis is on the reciprocal influence of religion and politics, on rival answers to questions about how Hebrews should relate to each other and to outsiders. New, in paperback, the book will be of interest to biblical scholars and readers as well as those concerned with the interaction of religion and political life. Read less

Introduction: The Political Consequences of a God-Centered Religion; 1: No Foreigner Can Control Israel: The Wife-Sister Motif Prefigures the Joseph Stories; 2: Survival Must Not Be Gained through Sin: The Moral of the Joseph Stories Prefigured through Judah and Tamar, Ruth and Naomi, Joseph and Mrs. Potiphar; 3: The Dreamer Is the Dream; 4: Fathers, Sons, and Brothers: Joseph and His Family; 5: The Egyptianization of Joseph Compared to the Hebraicization of Daniel and Esther; 6: Joseph the Administrator; 7: If These Are Jacob’s Blessings, What Would His Curses Be Like?; 8: Why Joseph-the-Assimilator Is Superseded by Moses-the-Lawgiver; 9: The Path Not Taken

Editor(s)

Biography

Aaron Wildavsky (1930-1993) was considered one of the most innovative and prolific scholars in the field of political research in our time. He is the author of Dilemmas of Presidential Leadership ( with Richard Ellis), The Beleaguered Presidency, and Craftways: On the Organization of Scholarly Work.

Assimilation Versus Separation Joseph the Administrator and the Politics of Religion in Biblical Israel

Description

Table of Contents

Editor(s)

Biography

SOCIAL NETWORKS

Secure Shopping Payment Options