1st Edition

Christians under the Crescent and Muslims under the Cross c.630 - 1923

By Luigi Berto Copyright 2021
    178 Pages
    by Routledge

    178 Pages
    by Routledge

    This book examines the status that rulers of one faith conferred onto their subjects belonging to a different one, how the rulers handled relationships with them, and the interactions between subjects of the Muslim and Christian religions.

    The chronological arc of this volume spans from the first conquests by the Arabs in the Near East in the 630s to the exchange between Turkey and Greece, in 1923, of the Orthodox Christians and Muslims residing in their territories. Through organized topics, Berto analyzes both similarities and differences in Christian and Muslim lands and emphasizes how coexistences and conflicts took directions that were not always inevitable. Primary sources are used to examine the mentality of those who composed them and of their audiences. In doing so, the book considers the nuances and all the features of the multifaceted experiences of Christian subjects under Muslim rule and of Muslim subjects under Christian rule.

    Christians under the Crescent and Muslims under the Cross is the ideal resource for upper-level undergraduates, postgraduates, and scholars interested in the relationships between Christians and Muslims, religious minorities, and the Near East and the Mediterranean from the Middle Ages to the early twentieth century.

    Introduction  1. Prohibitions, Laws and Justice  2. Conversions  3. Working  4. Sharing Beliefs and Spaces  5. Attacking the Other  6. Eliminating the Other  Conclusion


    Luigi Andrea Berto is professor of History at Western Michigan University (USA). His research focuses on Medieval Italy and the Mediterranean, with a special interest in the use of the past in the medieval and modern periods, and the relationships between Christians and Muslims.

    It is the rare book that does all the things I need a book to do for teaching undergraduates, but this book superbly accomplishes them all:

    it is written in cogent, clear English
    it is without an obvious agenda, especially an apologetic one
    it is relatively brief
    it avoids getting lost in the notes and apparatus, which undergrads often find bewildering
    it captures the messiness of history--the "nobody has clean hands" approach
    it is reasonably affordable in a paperback edition.

    Adam A. J. DeVille, University of Saint Francis, USA