1st Edition

Constitutional Politics and the Judiciary Decision-making in Central and Eastern Europe

Edited By Kálmán Pócza Copyright 2019
    274 Pages
    by Routledge

    274 Pages
    by Routledge

    Recent confrontations between constitutional courts and parliamentary majorities, for example in Poland and Hungary, have attracted international interest in the relationship between the judiciary and the legislature in Central and Eastern European countries. Several political actors have argued that courts have assumed too much power after the democratic transformation process in 1989/1990. These claims are explicitly or implicitly connected to the charge that courts have constrained the room for manoeuvre of the legislatures too heavily and that they have entered the field of politics. Nevertheless, the question to what extent has this aggregation of power constrained the dominant political actors has never been examined accurately and systematically in the literature. The present volume fills this gap by applying an innovative research methodology to quantify the impact and effect of court’s decisions on legislation and legislators, and measure the strength of judicial decisions in six CEE countries.

    Chapter 1: Introduction - Kálmán Pócza

    Chapter 2: Research methodology - Kálmán Pócza and Gábor Dobos

    Chapter 3: The Czech Constitutional Court: Far away from political influence - Katarína Šipulová

    Chapter 4: The German Federal Constitutional Court: Authority transformed into power? - Oliver W. Lembcke

    Chapter 5: The Hungarian Constitutional Court: A constructive partner in constitutional dialogue - Kálmán Pócza, Gábor Dobos and Attila Gyulai

    Chapter 6: The Polish Constitutional Tribunal: Deference beyond the veil of activism - Artur Wołek and Iga Kender-Jeziorska

    Chapter 7: The Romanian Constitutional Court: Muddling through democratic transition - Csongor Kuti

    Chapter 8: The Slovak Constitutional Court: The third legislator? - Erik Láštic and Max Steuer

    Chapter 9: Courts compared: The practice of constitutional adjudication in Central and Eastern Europe - Kálmán Pócza, Gábor Dobos and Attila Gyulai

    Biography

    Kálmán Pócza is senior research fellow at the Institute for Political Science of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences and associate professor at the Pázmány Péter Catholic University Budapest. He is the Principal Investigator of the JUDICON research project (www.judicon.tk.mta.hu).