Critical Geographies of Cycling : History, Political Economy and Culture book cover
1st Edition

Critical Geographies of Cycling
History, Political Economy and Culture

ISBN 9781138547261
Published February 12, 2018 by Routledge
290 Pages

FREE Standard Shipping
USD $54.95

Prices & shipping based on shipping country


Book Description

Examining cycling from a range of geographical perspectives, this book uses historical and contemporary case studies to look at the history, politics, economy and culture of cycling. Pursuing a post-structural position in viewing understandings of the bicycle as contingent upon time and place, author Glen Norcliffe argues for the need for widespread processes such as gendered use of the bicycle, the Cyclists’ Rights Movement, and the globalization of bicycle-making to be interpreted in different ways in different settings. With this in mind, the essays in the book are divided into two sections: relational aspects are examined as Spaces of Cycling which treats technological development, innovation, and the location of production and trade of cycles, while Places of Cycling interprets specific sites of consumption - the streets of the city, in the cycling clubs, among men and women, and at the trade show. Written from a geographer’s integrative perspective to offer a broad understanding of cycling, this book will also be of interest to other social scientists in urban studies, cultural studies, technology and society, sociology, history and environmental planning.

Table of Contents

Contents: Preface; For a geography of cycling. Part 1 Spaces of Cycling: G-COT: the geographical construction of technology; The Aha! myth: geographically embedded innovation in the Canadian cycle industry 1868-1900; Popeism and Fordism: examining the roots of mass production; Hypermobile global production networks: links of the Canadian cycle industry with China and Taiwan (co-authored with Weidong Liu and Boyang Gao). Part 2 Places of Cycling: Associations, modernity and club citizenship in a Victorian highwheel bicycle club; Men, women and the bicycle in the late nineteenth century (co-authored with Phillip Gordon Mackintosh); 'Thirty thousand wheelmen who never smile': national identity and the rise of the Canadian Wheelman's Association; Performing the bicycle trade show (co-authored with Michael Andreae and Jinn-yuh Hsu); Neoliberal mobility and its discontents: working tricycles in China's cities; Right to the road. Bibliography; Index.

View More



Glen Norcliffe is Professor Emeritus of Geography and Senior Scholar at York University, Toronto, Canada.


’With bicycle innovation having meandered from Germany to France, UK, USA and finally the Far East, a scholarly interpretation by a geographer was overdue. Yet the spatial turn of his book towards a geography of cycling covers far more of the often complex phenomena around the bicycle - from Victorian gender cycling to trade-show activities in Taipei. Using this as a structuring principle, significant chapters of the bicycle's cultural and economic past and present are analysed thoroughly. Easy to read, this comprehensive book is an intellectual delight and the first choice for everyone seeking an overall view on the bicycle's standing.’ Hans-Erhard Lessing, University of Ulm, Germany ’Glen Norcliffe has produced a volume of monumental scope. One that offers a much needed critical engagement with themes lying at the intersection of the social, cultural, political, economic, and industrial history and geography of cycles and cycling. The volume is a must read for geography and planning scholars interested in "the bicycle".’ Ron N. Buliung, University of Toronto Mississauga, Canada ’The essays presented in this book provide a valuable resource for cycling history and culture. Glen Norcliffe is respected both as a geographer and cycling historian, while his own geographical position, Canada, is unusual in cycling history. A particular strength of much of the content here is its wide geographical range, often global in scope, and its engagement with topics that all too often are the stuff of hearsay, rather than structured academic research.’ Nicholas Oddy, Glasgow School of Art, UK