1st Edition

Current Controversies in Philosophy of Science




ISBN 9781138825772
Published October 28, 2020 by Routledge
212 Pages 5 B/W Illustrations

USD $160.00

Prices & shipping based on shipping country


Preview

Book Description

Current Controversies in Philosophy of Science asks twelve philosophers to debate six questions that are driving contemporary work in this area of philosophy. The questions are:

I. Are Boltzmann Brains Bad?

II. Does Mathematical Explanation Require Mathematical Truth?

III. Does Quantum Mechanics Suggest Spacetime is Nonfundamental?

IV. Is Evolution Fundamental When It Comes to Defining Biological Ontology?

V. Is Chance Ontologically Fundamental?

VI. Are Sexes Natural Kinds?

These debates explore the philosophical foundations of particular scientific disciplines, while also examining more general issues in the philosophy of science. The result is a book that’s perfect for the advanced philosophy student, building up their knowledge of the foundations of the field and engaging with its cutting-edge questions. Preliminary descriptions of each chapter, annotated lists of further readings for each controversy, and study questions for each chapter help provide clearer and richer snapshots of active controversies for all readers.              

Table of Contents

Introduction
Ravit Dotan and Shamik Dasgupta

Part I: Are Boltzmann Brains Bad?

1. Why Boltzmann Brains Are Bad
Sean M. Carroll

2. What Follows from the Possibility of Boltzmann Brains?
Matthew Kotzen

Part II: Does Mathematical Explanation Require Mathematical Truth?

3. Mathematical Explanation Requires Mathematical Truth
Christopher Pincock

4. Mathematical Explanation Doesn’t Require Mathematical Truth
Mary Leng

Part III: Does Quantum Mechanics Suggest Spacetime is Non-fundamental?

5. Against Wavefunction Realism
David Wallace

6. Separability, Locality, and Higher Dimensions in Quantum Mechanics
Alyssa Ney

Part IV: Is Evolution Fundamental When it Comes to Defining Biological Ontology?

7. Is Evolution Fundamental When It Comes to Biological Ontology?
Maureen A. O'Malley

8. Is Evolution Fundamental When It Comes to Defining Biological Ontology? Yes
Ellen Clarke

Part V: Is Chance Ontologically Fundamental?

9. Chance and the Great Divide
Ned Hall

10. On Chance (or, Why I am Only a Half-Humean)
J. T. Ismael

Part VI: Are Sexes Natural Kinds?

11. Are Sexes Natural Kinds?
Muhammad Ali Khalidi

12 The Animal Sexes as Historical Explanatory Kinds
Laura Franklin-Hall

...
View More

Editor(s)

Biography

Shamik Dasgupta is Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of California, Berkeley, where he has taught since 2016. He works in metaphysics, philosophy of science, and value theory.

Ravit Dotan is a graduate student at the University of California, Berkeley. She specializes in epistemology, philosophy of science, and philosophy of machine learning.

Brad Weslake is Associate Professor of Philosophy at NYU Shanghai. His central research interest is philosophy of science, especially causation and explanation.