Announcements in the 1970s and 1980s of the death of kinship and descent as subjects of anthropological study were highly premature. These subjects continue routinely to be encountered in the course of empirical ethnographic research and to be reported upon in ethnographies ? or they are ignored at the peril of ethnographers pathetically unprepared to deal with them. Moreover, considerable evidence has accumulated that systems of social relations built on relations of genealogical connection exhibit a remarkable degree of orderliness about which it is possible already to make a number of substantial empirical generalizations, especially about the qualities of social relations within and between groups. As the masters of the subject always stressed, kinship and political and jural organization are closely interdependent structures. In this wide-ranging theoretical and comparative-ethnographic study, Harold Scheffler demonstrates that there is a simple reason why detection of this order has been too long delayed and has given rise to more destructive than to constructive debate in social anthropology.
Table of Contents
Introduction -- General Considerations -- Kinship and Descent -- Descent Groups -- Jural Structures I -- Jural Structures II -- Specific Instances -- Patrifiliation Necessary and Sufficient -- Patrifiliation Necessary but Not Sufficient -- Patrifiliation Sufficient but Not Necessary I -- Patrifiliation Sufficient but Not Necessary II -- Joint-Family Systems -- Cognatic Descent Groups?