1st Edition

Foucault's Monsters and the Challenge of Law

By Alex Sharpe Copyright 2010
204 Pages
by Routledge-Cavendish

200 Pages
by Routledge-Cavendish

200 Pages
by Routledge-Cavendish

In contrast to other figures generated within social theory for thinking about outsiders, such as Rene Girard’s ‘scapegoat’ and Zygmunt Bauman’s ‘stranger’, Foucault’s Monsters and the Challenge of Law suggests that the figure of ‘the monster’ offers greater analytical precision and explanatory power in relation to understanding the processes whereby outsiders are constituted. The book draws... Read more
1. Introduction  Part 1: History/Theory/Monsters  2. Foucault’s Theoretical Framework  3. Foucault’s Monsters as Genealogy: The Abnormal Individual  4. An English Legal History of Monsters  Part 2: Contemporary Monsters  5. Changing Sex: The Problem of Transsexuality  6. Sharing Bodies: The Problem of Conjoined Twins  7. Admixing Embryos: The Problem of Human/Animal Hybrids  8. Conclusions

Biography

Alex Sharpe is Professor of Law at Keele University.

“One of the rites of passage for all legal and socio-legal scholars is to give at least some consideration to the fundamental norms of modern liberal rule … Foucault’s Monsters … [is] an attempt to speak to this rite of passage topic. It is, moreover, a very good attempt. … Sharpe is to be congratulated for her contribution to this longstanding debate. Making a mark in this field is no mean feat”

- Professor Gary Wickham, (2010) 37(4) Journal of Law and Society 691

Foucault's Monsters and the Challenge of Law is a very erudite and impeccably serious book about monsters … it is the first book in English which seriously engages with [Foucault’s] Abnormal lecture course. It is clearly written, well-researched and full of insightful historical and theoretical detail. [An] excellent book”

- Associate Professor Ben Golder, (2011) 74(4) Modern Law Review 639

“Sharpe’s book is a rare gem in this second wave of Foucaultian legal research. … Th[e] book is exceptionally relevant. It works its way through the genealogy of the monster in law only to enter into a very current debate that will be highly illuminating for anyone working in, for example, medical law or bioethics as well as the general history of legal thinking”

- Professor Panu Minkkinen, (2011) 7(3) Law, Culture & the Humanities 488