1st Edition
Islam, Democracy and Dialogue in Turkey Deliberating in Divided Societies
By Bora Kanra
Copyright 2009
192 Pages
by
Routledge
192 Pages
by
Routledge
Also available as eBook on:
Most theorists of deliberative democracy treat deliberation as a procedure in decision-making. This approach neglects an important phase oriented not so much to decision-making but to social learning and understanding. Combining deliberative theory with research from social psychology, Bora Kanra has developed an innovative critique and synthesis by allocating social learning its own formal... Read more
Chapter 1 Introduction, Bora Kanra; Chapter 2 Deliberation as Social Learning, Bora Kanra; Chapter 3 Background to the Case of Turkey, Bora Kanra; Chapter 4 The Q Study, Bora Kanra; Chapter 5 Discourse Analysis, Bora Kanra; Chapter 6 Discourse Comparison, Bora Kanra; Chapter 7 Prospects for New Forms of Cooperation, Bora Kanra; Chapter 8 Further Reflections on Social Learning, Bora Kanra; Chapter 9 Conclusion, Bora KanraAppendix 1 Q study Part icipants profile, Bora KanraAppendix 2 Q study statements and rankings, Bora Kanra;
Biography
Bora Kanra is ARC Australian Postdoctoral Fellow at the Australian National University, Australia
'In this unusual work, which combines normative political theory with empirical opinion research and deliberative discourse analysis, Bora Kanra analyzes the major political divisions in Turkish society and comes to a surprising conclusion: on important issues such as human rights and the limits of state power, a strong convergence exists between the democratic new left and sectors of the Islamist movement in Turkey. Kanra argues that deliberative processes can help build convergences during the opinion formation stage in complex and strongly divided societies. A truly successful integration of empirical and theoretical research by a rising scholar of political theory.' Seyla Benhabib, Yale University, USA '...I see this as an exceedingly valuable contribution that makes a number of highly intriguing observations. I would hope that both politicians and journalists in Turkey will read it as it does make strides in finding agreement between groups one normally would not expect to agree. In addition, stupents of political science or Middle Eastern and/or Ottoman/Turkish history will find this text to be quite valuable.' Digest of Middle East Studies
