Law and Agonistic Politics
The Ancient Greek notion of agonism, meaning struggle, has been revived in radical legal and political theory to rethematize class conflict and to conceptualize the conditions of possibility of freedom and social transformation in contemporary society. Insisting that what is ultimately at stake in politics are the terms in which social conflict is represented, agonists highlight the importance of the strategic, affective and aesthetic aspects of politics for democratic praxis. This volume examines the implications of this critical perspective for understanding law and considers how law serves either to sustain or curtail the democratic agon. While sharing a critical perspective on the deliberative turn in legal and political theory and its tendency to depoliticize social conflict, the various contributors to this volume diverge in arguing variously for pragmatic, expressivist or strategic conceptions of agonism. In doing so they question the glib assumptions that often underlie a sometimes too easy celebration of conflict as an antidote to de-politicizing consensus. This thought provoking volume will be of interest to students and researchers working in legal and political theory and philosophy.
'Agonism is often described in terms of what it opposes or lacks rather than what it stands for. Its critics claim agonists have little to say about law. This important volume says otherwise. Most of its first rate contributions stand up for agonism, promoting agonistic politics as best fitted to the plural, fractious situation of late modern democracies. Distinguishing among different brands of agonism and covering a wide variety of thinkers and cases, this book will quite simply change the way political and legal theorists think about agonism and law. A must-read.' Bonnie Honig, Northwestern University, USA 'Schaap's collection should be considered a timely and welcome contribution to the field of agonistic critique, as too often that body of literature elides engagement with the question of law as such. To note that a politics of conflict is always already launched within a legal context, and then to ask what sort of problematic relation such a politics takes in relation to that context, is already an achievement. This volume goes well beyond, however, sketching in broad strokes the complex terms by which agonistic politics is shot through with the law, even as it moves to displace it.' Law, Culture & the Humanities ’The volume, thus, deserves to be read not only by agonistic theorists, but also by democratic theorists more generally.’ Contemporary Political Theory