1st Edition

Menstruation and Procreation in Early Modern France

By Cathy McClive Copyright 2015
280 Pages
by Routledge

280 Pages
by Routledge

280 Pages
by Routledge

Early modern bodies, particularly menstruating and pregnant bodies, were not stable signifiers. Menstruation and Procreation in Early Modern France presents the first full-length discussion of menstruation and its uncertain connections with embodied sex, gender and reproduction in early modern France. Attitudes to menstruation are explored in three inter-linked arenas: medicine, moral theology and... Read more
Contents: Introduction: blood, menses and the myth of ’menstrual misogyny’; Leviticus and the problem of sex during genital fluxes; Menstruation, conception and the timely use of marriage; ’I await my rules which do not arrive’: menstrual regularity and irregular menstruation; Detecting and proving pregnancy; Menstrual time and the moons of pregnancy; Bleeding hermaphrodites and menstruating men; Conclusions; Select bibliography; Index.

Biography

Cathy McClive is Lecturer in Early Modern European History at Durham University, UK.

'... a highly original and important book which illustrates clearly how legal sources can be used creatively alongside medical accounts and diaries, letters and other sources to answer questions about gender. The focus on menstruation is an excellent corrective to the focus on structure rather than on function that characterises the work of Laqueur and his followers, and relates to a wider interest in the role of the fluid body in pre-modern thinking.' - Professor Helen King, The Open University, UK

'McClive’s account calls into question the prevailing scholarship on menstruation and gender difference in early modern Europe. Her book offers an important contribution to our understanding of the meanings of menstruation and its implications in terms of embodied identity...Thoroughly researched and clearly written, McClive’s book will be appreciated most by early modern historians of medicine and the body.' - Claire Cage, University of South Alabama, Bulletin of the History of Medicine