1. Introduction
Part 1: Metaethics The Descriptive Consequences of Moral Disagreement
2. Explaining Moral Disagreement
3. Making Room for Disagreement
4. Interpreting Moral Disagreements
Part 2: Epistemology and Normative Ethics Normative Personal Consequences of Moral Disagreement
5. The Epistemic Significance of Peer Disagreement
6. Applied Epistemology of Moral Disagreement
7. From What We Ought to Believe to What We Ought to Do
Part 3: Political Philosophy Normative Interpersonal Consequences of Moral Disagreement
8. Moral Compromise
9. Public Reason, Legitimate State Action, and Justifiability to All
10. Democracy and Deliberative Restraint
Part 4: Metaethics and Disagreement’s Normative Implications
11. Metaethics and the Normative Implications of Moral Disagreement
Conclusion.
Glossary
Bibliography
Index
Biography
Rach Cosker-Rowland is an Associate Professor in the School of Philosophy, Religion, and History of Science at the University of Leeds, UK. They are the author of The Normative and the Evaluative (2019), and the co-editor of Companions in Guilt Arguments in Metaethics (Routledge, 2019).
