1st Edition
Nature in the History of Economic Thought How Natural Resources Became an Economic Concept
Preface
List of Abbreviations
PART I ATTITUDES TOWARD NATURE
FROM ANTIQUITY TO MERCANTILISM
1 From Antiquity to the Renaissance
2 Mercantilism and Natural Resources
PART II THE ENLIGHTENMENT ROOTS
OF CLASSICAL POLITICAL ECONOMY
3 Pre-Classical Enlightenment Developments
4 The Physiocrats and the Bread Riots
5 From Adam Smith to Classical Political Economy
6 John Stuart Mill and the Idea of Progress
PART III MANAGING THE USE OF NATURE
7 Managing Nature in the Enlightenment
8 Ricardo and Malthus on the Utilization of Nature
9 Jean-Baptiste Say and Other Contemporaries
10 John Stuart Mill’s Attitude toward Nature
Epilogue: From Socialism to Modernity
Biography
Nathaniel Wolloch is an independent scholar from Israel, specializing in European intellectual history. He is the author of Subjugated Animals: Animals and Anthropocentrism in Early Modern European Culture (2006), and History and Nature in the Enlightenment: Praise of the Mastery of Nature in Eighteenth-Century Historical Literature (2011).
'Clearly written and carefully organized, this book restores the subject of nature to the history of economics. It demonstrates in rich detail that economists may not have given much weight to nature as an independent source of wealth, but from the Greeks to the modern era they have been profoundly important in shaping our use of the natural world.'
Donald Worster, University of Kansas, USA
Author of "Shrinking the Earth: The Rise and Decline of American Abundance"
'Wolloch provides a clear and judicious account of the role of land in the thinking of some of the leading classical and Enlightenment economic writers, and demonstrates clearly that their major preoccupation was under-, not over-exploitation of that resource.'
Paul Warde, University of Cambridge, UK
'Wolloch’s main trope is that western economics has always treated nature as a dumping ground with little regard to questions of sustainability... his account serves to provoke further debate and invite the careful reader to revisit earlier economic discourse as a means to reflect on the human condition.'
Margaret Schabas, Journal of Modern History






