© 2017 – Routledge
The current political climate of uncompromising neoliberalism means that the need to study the logic of our culture—that is, the logic of the capitalist system—is compelling. Providing a rich philosophical analysis of democracy from a negative, non-identity, dialectical perspective, Vasilis Grollios encourages the reader not to think of democracy as a call for a more effective domination of the people or as a demand for the replacement of the elite that currently holds power. In doing so, he aspires to fill in a gap in the literature by offering an out-of-the-mainstream overview of the key concepts of totality, negativity, fetishization, contradiction, identity thinking, dialectics and corporeal materialism as they have been employed by the major thinkers of the critical theory tradition: Marx, Engels, Horkheimer, Lukacs, Adorno, Marcuse, Bloch and Holloway.
Their thinking had the following common keywords: contradiction, fetishism as a process and the notion of spell and all its implications. The author makes an innovative attempt to bring these concepts to light in terms of their practical relevance for contemporary democratic theory.
How do we get out of here? We know that capitalism is a catastrophe for humanity, but we seem to be trapped. All our struggles seem to lead us back to the same starting point: the reproduction, in one way or another, of the logic of capital, the logic of death and destruction. We desperately need to break the grammar of capital, the conceptual and organisational framework that leads us round and round in circles. That is why Vasilis Grollios’s book is so important. It is not just an excellent development of an intellectual tradition: it confronts us with the need to break deadening, death-bringing mainstream theory. Read it. -John Holloway, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla
Chapter 1: Marx and Engels’s Critique of Democracy:
The Materialist Character of their Concept of Autonomy
Chapter 2: Dialectics and the Transition to Socialism in Late F. Engels’s Philosophy of
History: Freeing Marx from the ‘Withering Away of the State’ theory
Chapter 3: Max Horkheimer’s Dialectics Rehabilitated: How Horkheimer’s ‘Open
Marxism’ Cracks Capitalism
Chapter 4: Dialectics and Democracy in Georg Lukacs’ Marxism
Chapter 5: False Social Totality and the Ineffable Integrity in T. Adorno’s Negative
Dialectics: The Critical Theorist and the Challenges of the 21st Century
Chapter 6: Determinate Negation of the One-dimensional Society: How Herbert
Marcuse’s Great Refusal Cracks Capitalism
Chapter 7: Finding Hope in the Nihilism of Bourgeois Life. Ernst Bloch’s Open Marxism
Chapter 8: The Descendants of Negative Dialectics. Dialectics and Democracy in Open
Advisory Board: Benjamin Barber (City University of New York), Rajeev Bhargava (Centre for the Study of Developing Societies), Bhikhu Parekh (House of Lords), Fred Dallmayr (University of Notre Dame), John Keane (University of Sydney), Chantal Mouffe (University of Westminster)
Democracy is being re-thought almost everywhere today: with the widespread questioning of the rationalist assumptions of classical liberalism, and the implications this has for representational competition; with the Arab Spring, destabilizing many assumptions about the geographic spread of democracy; with the deficits of democracy apparent in the Euro-zone crisis, especially as it affects the management of budget deficits; with democracy increasingly understand as a process of social empowerment and equalization, blurring the lines of division between formal and informal spheres; and with growing demands for democracy to be reformulated to include the needs of those currently marginalized or even to include the representation of non-human forms of life with whom we share our planet.
Routledge Advances in Democratic Theory publishes state of the art theoretical reflection on the problems and prospects of democratic theory when many of the traditional categories and concepts are being reworked and rethought in our globalized and complex times.
The series is published in cooperation with the Centre for the Study of Democracy, University of Westminster, London, UK.