1st Edition
New Perspectives on Platonic Dialectic A Philosophy of Inquiry
Introduction
Jens Kristian Larsen, Vivil Valvik Haraldsen, and Justin Vlasits
1. Socrates’ Dialectical use of Hypothesis
Hayden Ausland
2. The Dialectician and the Statesman in Plato’s Euthydemus
Emily Austin
3. Dialectic in Plato’s Parmenides: The Schooling of Young Socrates
Francisco Gonzalez
4. Dialectic as a paradigm in the Republic: On the role of reason in the just life
Vivil Valvik Haraldsen
5. Elenchus and the Method of Division in the Sophist
Cristina Ionescu
6. Using Examples in Philosophical Inquiry: Plato’s Statesman 277d1-278e2 and 285c4-286b2
Jens Kristian Larsen
7. Examples in the Meno
Peter D. Larsen
8. Between Variety and Unity. How to deal with Plato´s Dialectic
Walter Mesch
9. Dialectic and the Ability to Orient Ourselves: Republic V-VII
Vasilis Politis
10. Another Platonic Method: Four genealogical myths about human nature and their philosophical contribution in Plato
Catherine Rowett
11. Dialectic in Plato's Sophist: The relation between the question ‘What is being?’ and the question ‘What is there?’
Pauline Sabrier
12. Dialectic as Philosophical Divination in Plato’s Phaedrus
Marilena Vlad
13. Plato on the Varieties of Knowledge
Justin Vlasits
Biography
Jens Kristian Larsen is Associate Professor of Philosophy at NTNU, Norway. He specializes in ancient philosophy, in particular Plato, and phenomenology. He recently published "What are Collections and Divisions Good for? A reconsideration of Plato’s Phaedrus (2020) and co-edited the anthology Phenomenological Interpretations of Ancient Philosophy (2021).
Vivil Valvik Haraldsen is ph.d.-candidate in philosophy at the University of Oslo. She has published articles on Plato’s Republic and book chapters on Plato’s Protagoras, Phaedrus, and Apology of Socrates, and has co-edited the anthology Readings of Plato’s Apology of Socrates: Defending the Philosophical Life (2018).
Justin Vlasits is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of Illinois at Chicago. He specializes in all periods of ancient philosophy, with special emphasis on logic and philosophy of science. He has co-edited Epistemology after Sextus Empiricus with Katja Maria Vogt (2020).
"I find this a most useful volume, in which interesting new insights on an admittedly fairly well-worn subject are presented. Its most important feature is an insistence on the continuity of Plato’s thought, and on the degree to which various different strategies of argument that appear in dialogues of various periods, the Socratic elenchus, hypothesis, and ‘collection and division’, are seen to be compatible and coherent. This goes counter to the views of many modern interpreters of Plato, but I think it is a perspective well worth developing, and it is accomplished with vigour here." – John Dillon, Trinity College Dublin
