This book examines the origins of Australia’s constitutional religious freedom provision. It explores, on the one hand, the political activities and motives of religious leaders seeking to give the Australian Constitution a religious character and, on the other, the political activities and motives of a religious minority seeking to prevent the Australian Constitution having a religious character. The book also interrogates the argument advanced at the Federal Convention in favour of section 116, dealing with separation of religion and government, and argues that until now scholars and courts have misunderstood that argument. The book casts new light to show how the origins of the provision lead to section 116 being conceptualised as a safeguard against religious intolerance on the part of the Commonwealth. Written in an accessible style, the work has potential to influence the development of constitutional doctrine by the High Court through its challenge of historical assumptions on which the High Court’s current doctrine is based. Given the ongoing political debates concerning the interaction of discrimination law and religious freedom, the book will be of interest to academics and policy-makers working in the areas of law and religion, constitutional law and comparative law.
'As matters of religion become more contentious in Australia, Beck's thorough, clear and insightful analysis of the religion provisions of the Australian constitution is welcome and timely. This book provides a fascinating history of the legal, political and social aspects of one of the few rights provisions of the constitution.'
Carolyn Evans, the University of Melbourne, Australia
'The Australian Constitution’s references to religion have long been misunderstood. This work of meticulous and engaging scholarship uncovers their true historical origins and explains their foundational meaning. In doing so, it throws light on Australia’s historical culture, underlining its significance for both legal and popular understanding of law and religion today. Beck’s book will change minds.'
Helen Irving, The University of Sydney, Australia
'Does Australia's Constitution protect religious freedom? Does it separate religion and state? Luke Beck has given us a genuinely original, meticulously-researched and eye-opening take on how the Constitution'sreligion clauses got there, and what they mean - with potentially far-reaching consequences. More, it's thoroughly readable!'
Marion Maddox, Macquarie University, Australia
Foreword: The Honourable Robert S French AC, Chief Justice of Australia 2008-2017
Chapter 1: A Sabbath Breaker in the Stocks
Chapter 2: Arguing for a Religious Character to the Australian Constitution
Chapter 3: Arguing Against a Religious Character to the Australian Constitution
Chapter 4: A Constitutional Recognition of God
Chapter 5: A Constitutional Prohibition on Religious Laws
Chapter 6: The Argument for Section 116
Chapter 7: The Language of Section 116
Chapter 8: The Original Understanding of Section 116
Chapter 9: Section 116 as a Safeguard Against Religious Intolerance
Chapter 10: HV Evatt’s Attempts to Amend Section 116
Chapter 11: Post-War Attempts to Amend Section 116
Chapter 12: The Future of Section 116
The ICLARS Series on Law and Religion is designed to provide a forum for the rapidly expanding field of research in law and religion. The series is published in association with the International Consortium for Law and Religion Studies, an international network of scholars and experts of law and religion founded in 2007 with the aim of providing a place where information, data and opinions can easily be exchanged among members and made available to the broader scientific community (www.iclars.org). The series aims to become a primary source for students and scholars while presenting authors with a valuable means to reach a wide and growing readership.
The series editors are currently welcoming proposals for this new series on any matter falling under ‘law and religion’ widely defined. Collections arising from important conferences and events are welcome as well as monographs by both established names and new voices (including monographs based on doctoral dissertations). Also of interest are interdisciplinary works and studies of particular jurisdictions.