1st Edition

The Official History of the UK Strategic Nuclear Deterrent Volume I: From the V-Bomber Era to the Arrival of Polaris, 1945-1964

By Matthew Jones Copyright 2017
568 Pages
by Routledge

568 Pages
by Routledge

568 Pages
by Routledge

Volume I of The Official History of the UK Strategic Nuclear Deterrent provides an authoritative and in-depth examination of the British government’s strategic nuclear policy from 1945 to 1964. Written with full access to the UK documentary record, this volume examines how British governments after 1945 tried to build and then maintain an independent, nationally controlled strategic... Read more

Preface

1. The making of a deterrent force, August 1945-November 1957

2. The rise of ballistic missile defence

3. In the shadow of Sputnik: The nuclear sufficiency debate and the restoration of Anglo-American nuclear collaboration, March 1957-February 1959

4. Breaking the impasse? Polaris and deterrent policy, February 1959-March 1960

5. The future nuclear programme and the cancellation of Blue Streak, December 1959-April 1960

6. Skybolt, Polaris and the control of Western nuclear forces, March 1960-May 1961

7. An arms race intensifies: ABM defence, nuclear testing, and the criteria of deterrence, January 1961-January 1962

8. Revising the criteria, January-May 1962

9. The prelude to Nassau, June-December 1962

10. Securing Polaris: The Nassau negotiations, December 1962 – January 1963

11. The path to the Polaris Sales Agreement, January – April 1963

12. The origins of a Polaris improvement programme: HR 169 and the emergence of the Moscow ABM system

13. The MLF, the size of the Polaris force, and the approach of the general election, May 1963 – October 1964

Biography

Matthew Jones is Professor of International History at the London School of Economics and Political Science, UK, and author of, amongst other books, After Hiroshima: The United States, Race, and Nuclear Weapons in Asia, 1945–1965 (2010).

'The author had access to Government records and was able to interview some of the participants to cover the high-level politics. I was surprised to find it difficult to break off reading because it was compiled from extracts from files, letters and reports of meetings. Professor Jones has done a splendid job putting it all together as a readable story.'--Reg Milne, Afterburner