1st Edition

The Ontology of Physics for Biology Semantic Modeling of Multiscale, Multidomain Physiological Systems

    240 Pages 58 B/W Illustrations
    by CRC Press

    This book introduces semantic representations of multiscale, multidomain physiological systems that link to qualitative reasoning and to quantitative analysis of biophysical processes in health and disease. Two major public health problems, diabetes and hypertension, serve as use-cases to illustrate the depth and rigor of such representations for logical inference and quantitative analysis. Central to this approach is the Ontology of Physics for Biology (OPB) that formally represents the foundations of classical physics and engineering system dynamics that are the basis for our understanding of biomedical entities, processes, and functional relationships.

    Furthermore, we introduce OPB-based software for annotating and abstracting available biosimulation models for reuse, recombination, and for archiving of physics-based biomedical knowledge. We have formalized and leveraged physics-based biological knowledge as a working view of physiology and biophysics from three distinct perspectives: (1) biologists and biomedical investigators, (2) biophysicists and bioengineers, and (3) biomedical ontologists and informaticists. We present a logical and intuitive semantics of classical physics as a tool for mediating and translating biophysical knowledge among biomedical domains.

    Daniel L. Cook, MD, PhD

    John H. Gennari, PhD

    Maxwell L. Neal, PhD

    Rationale

    Preface – What We Are Talking About, and Why

    Glossary

    Chapter 1 ◾ Biomedical Challenges

    REAL-WORLD USE-CASES – THE NEED FOR UNDERSTANDING

    SCOPE OF THE MULTIDOMAIN, MULTISCALE CHALLENGE

    Types of Things (Continuants)

    Types of Processes (Occurrents)

    Physiological Domains

    Physical Property Measures and Analysis

    Understanding Systems, Predicting Outcomes

    The Challenges

    USE CASE 1: HYPERTENSION AS FAILED BLOOD PRESSURE CONTROL

    Arterial Hypertension – Anatomy and Physiology

    The Cardiac Cycle

    Blood Flow through the Arteries, Arterioles, and Capillaries

    Pulsatile Blood Pressure and Flow through the Vascular System

    Systemic Control of Blood Pressure and Flow

    USE CASE 2: DIABETES MELLITUS AS FAILED BLOOD SUGAR CONTROL

    Clinical Test for Elevated Blood Sugar

    Multiscale, Multidomain Pathophysiology of Diabetes

    Pancreatic Hormones as Blood Glucose Controllers

    Cellular Metabolic Energy Production and Regulation

    Systemic Control of Metabolism

    Disease as Failure of Feedback Control

    CHALLENGES OF MULTISCALE, MULTIDOMAIN ANALYSIS

    Domain Technology “Silos”

    The Systems Perspective

    Challenges of Feedback and Homeostasis

    Disease as Feedback Control Failures

    Need for Informatics and Analysis

    HYPOTHESIS EXPRESSION AND ANALYSIS

    Narratives, Diagrams, and Computations

    Qualitative Functional Reasoning

    Quantitative Analysis and Simulation

    CHALLENGES – NEED FOR INFORMATION, KNOWLEDGE, AND ANALYSIS

    Chapter 2 ◾ Biomedical Information and Data Resources

    BIOINFORMATICS RESOURCES: PHYSICAL ENTITIES

    Anatomy Resources

    Tissue and Cell Type Resources

    Cellular Components

    Proteins

    Small Chemical Species

    BIOINFORMATICS RESOURCES: PHYSICAL PROCESSES

    Enzymatic Biochemical Reactions and EC Numbers

    Protein–Protein Interaction Databases

    Gene Ontology: Biological Process and Molecular Function

    Pathway Resources

    Quantitative Biosimulation Model Resources

    PHYSICAL PROPERTIES FOR PHYSIOLOGY

    VISUALIZING BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES

    PUTTING IT TOGETHER: THE PHYSIOME VISION

    Chapter 3 ◾ Biomedical Ontologies

    ONTOLOGY – THINGS, RELATIONS, CLASSES, INSTANCES

    AN EXAMPLE ONTOLOGY: THE FOUNDATIONAL MODEL OF ANATOMY

    ONTOLOGIES: WHY?

    ONTOLOGY QUALITY

    UPPER-LEVEL ONTOLOGIES

    Basic Formal Ontology

    Relations Ontology (RO)

    OPB – THE QUANTITIES AND DEPENDENCIES OF CLASSICAL PHYSICS

    Chapter 4 ◾ Biophysical Systems Analysis

    “MODEL”?

    Memory – Recall as Prediction

    Mimicry – Modeling “As If”

    Mechanism – Testing Physics-Based Hypotheses

    PHYSIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS ACROSS MULTIPLE SCALES

    Chemical Reaction Processes

    Molecular Signaling Pathways

    Organ System Processes

    REPRESENTING BIOPHYSICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE

    CRAFT OF QUANTITATIVE MODELING OF MECHANISM

    Mathematics – Differential and Integral Calculus

    Variables vs. Parameters

    Getting the Best-Fit – Parameter Optimization and Sensitivity

    MODELING SCOPE AND SCALE

    Space and Time Are Continuous and Unbounded

    Object vs. Process Models

    Collections of Discrete Things

    KINDS OF PHYSICAL MEASURES

    Physical Measures in Biophysics and Engineering

    Biological Measures Present Quantification Issues

    Continuous vs. Discrete Measures

    Categorical Measures

    Population Measures

    ATTRIBUTES OF PHYSICAL MEASURES

    Precision vs. Accuracy

    Number Forms

    Units of Measure

    Property Dimensions

    Notations of Scale

    Normalized and Dimensionless Quantities

    Extensive vs. Intensive Measures

    SUMMARY, NEXT STEPS

    Chapter 5 ◾ System Dynamic Modeling

    PRINCIPLES OF SYSTEM DYNAMICS

    Basis in Classical Physics

    Conservation Laws

    Stocks and Flows

    System State

    Partial Differential Equations (PDEs) or Finite Element (FE) Analysis

    Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs)

    Systems Analysis Illustrated

    SYSTEM PROCESSES

    Metabolic Flow Processes

    Fluid Flow Processes

    Ion Flow Processes

    SYSTEM DYNAMICS MODELING

    Principles of Stock-and-Flow Modeling

    Classical Laws

    Systems Pathway Perspective

    QUALITATIVE, DISCRETE CAUSAL METHODS

    Agent-Based Models

    Cause–Effect Inference

    Chalkboard Semantics-Based Modeling and Causal Reasoning

    Advantages and Limitations of Qualitative Methods

    QUANTITATIVE SYSTEMS ANALYSIS

    System Dynamic Modeling – Participants, Processes, and Properties

    Modeling Continuum Entities – Partial Differential Equations, PDEs

    Modeling Systems of Discrete Entities – Ordinary Differential Equations, ODEs

    Network Thermodynamics and Bond-Graph Theory

    Hybrid Qualitative, Quantitative Modeling

    Modularization – A Solution for Biophysical Modeling?

    “Goodness of Fit” – The Predictive Value of a Model

    Sensitivity Analysis and Model “Optimization”

    SUMMARY

    Chapter 6 ◾ Ontology of Physics for Biology

    OPB – AIMS, SCOPE, AND STATUS

    BACKGROUND AND MOTIVATION

    OPB – Precursors and Neighbors

    OPB ORGANIZATION AND TOP CLASSES

    OPB:PHYSICS ANNOTATION ENTITY

    OPB:Physics Domain

    OPB:Physics Model

    OPB:Physics Real Entity

    OPB:PHYSICS PROPERTY – OBSERVABLE AND COMPUTABLE

    Dynamical Properties

    OPB:Dynamical Property Classified by Dynamical Domain

    OPB:hasPhysicalDomain Generalizes Physical Rules and Laws

    Dynamical Properties Are Attributes of Continuants and Processes

    OPB:PHYSICS DEPENDENCY – PHYSICAL LAWS AND CONSTRAINTS

    OPB:hasPropertyPlayer Relations

    OPB:Calculus Dependency – Temporal and Spatial

    OPB:Constitutive Dependency, OPB:Constitutive Property

    OPB:Mono-Constitutive Dependency of a Single Participant

    OPB:Dual Constitutive Dependency between Two Continuant Participants

    OPB:THERMODYNAMIC ENTITY

    Thermodynamic Properties and Dependencies

    Thermodynamics Is Universal

    OPB:PHYSICS PROCESS

    “Process” – Ontological Scope, Participation, and Properties

    OPB:Physics Process – Observable Process Events

    OPB – STATE OF DEVELOPMENT AND FUTURE

    Chapter 7 ◾ OPB-Based Semantic Modeling

    ANNOTATION OF BIOSIMULATION MODELS: CURRENT PRACTICES

    COMPOSITE ANNOTATIONS

    THE SEMSIM ARCHITECTURE

    Organization of the SemSim Architecture

    The SemSim Application Programming Interface (API)

    PHYSIOMAP ARCHITECTURE

    Representing Processes in PhysioMaps

    SEMGEN

    QUALITATIVE INFERENCE USING OPB AND SEMSIM MODELS

    VISION FOR A SEMANTICALLY-INTEGRATED PHYSIOME

    DATA ANNOTATION FOR REUSE

    STANDARDIZED ANNOTATIONS FOR MODELING PROJECTS

    Chapter 8 ◾ OPB Review and Possibilities

    OPB USES AND APPLICATIONS

    OPB – QUANTITATIVE FOUNDATIONS; SEMANTIC PERSPECTIVES

    BIBLIOGRAPHY

    INDEX

    Biography

    Daniel L. Cook is an Emeritus Professor of Physiology and Biophysics at the University of Washington, Seattle. He graduated (BSME, 1967) from the University of Michigan Mechanical Engineering and worked at the Boeing Airplane Company, first, to manufacture the first 747 airliner, and then to analyze the structural dynamic of the (unbuilt) Boeing supersonic transport (SST). Taking an interest in the emerging field of bioengineering, he earned a Masters Degree in Mechanical Engineering (UW, MSME, 1971) modeling the cellular dynamics of insulin secretion. He then entered the UW's Medical Scientist Training Program (MSTP, 1971) to earn MD and PhD degrees. He has published seminal laboratory and modeling studies of the electrophysiology of insulin secretion, and of auditory sound localization. He is retired and lives in Seattle with his wife.

    John H. Gennari is a Professor and Graduate Program Director for Biomedical & Health Informatics (BHI) at the University of Washington. His background is in computer science and artificial intelligence, and was introduced to the field of biomedical informatics in the early 1990s at Stanford University. There, he developed an interest in knowledge representation as applied to biomedical applications, and collaborated with early developers of ontologies. After joining the University of Washington in 2002, he began his collaboration with Max, Dan, and Cornelius Rosse around models of anatomy and physiology. In addition to teaching and leadership roles in BHI, John continues to be active in research, furthering efforts in standards development and reproducibility. John enjoys Seattle and the pacific northwest with his family.

    Maxwell L. Neal is a Senior Scientist at Seattle Children’s Research Institute. Since his first exposure to dynamic physiological modeling while working on DARPA’s VSP, Max’s work has focused on applying computational methods to understand various biological systems as well as the development of standards and tools that facilitate systems-level biological modeling. Meeting and collaborating with John and Dan during the VSP established his long-standing interest in semantics-based representations of biosimulation models, which he studied for his Ph.D. at the University of Washington. Since then, he has led the adoption of community-ratified metadata standards for biosimulation and models as well as the development of software for semantics-based biological modeling. He lives in the Seattle area with his wife and son.