1st Edition

The Socialist Alternative to Bolshevik Russia The Socialist Revolutionary Party, 1921-39

By Elizabeth White Copyright 2011
180 Pages 2 B/W Illustrations
by Routledge

192 Pages 2 B/W Illustrations
by Routledge

180 Pages 2 B/W Illustrations
by Routledge

The Socialist Revolutionary party, which had been the largest and most popular party in Russia in 1917, did not after the October Revolution just disappear into the "dustbin of history", as Trotsky hoped, but – led by its leadership in exile in the 1920s and 1930s – continued to observe and comment on developments in Russia. In emigration, the Socialist Revolutionary (SR) party often put... Read more

1. SRs as Russian Revolutionaries  2. The Socialist Revolutionary Party in Prague  3. The Soviet Union during NEP  4. The Bolshevik Regime, Soviet Society and SR Political Tactics  5. The Socialist League of the New East  6. The SRs and Stalin’s Great Turn  7. The Collectivisation of Agriculture  8. The 1930s and the Road to War 

Biography

Elizabeth White is Lecturer in international history at the University of Ulster, UK.

"White’s book complements and supplements existing major scholarship on the SR party, which has focused primarily on the history of the party and its splits, and its terrorist and agrarian policies in the turbulent period between 1905 and 1917. It also contributes to the burgeoning study of the Russian e´migre´ community. Her work, which is based on a comprehensive examination of party archival material, contains some very perceptive insights and useful commentary... White is to be commended for her efforts in producing a book that makes an important contribution to the study of e´migre´ politics, and highlights the significant contribution that the Prague SRs made to the intellectual and political history of inter-war Europe and the Soviet Union." - Alexander Trapeznik, University of Otago; Revolutionary Russia, Vol. 24, No. 2, December 2011

‘In this original study the author has done a very competent job in telling the story of the Prague SR e´migre´ s, and she is right to say that their study is part of European history. Their commentary also makes possible a more profound understanding of developments in the Soviet Union’ -- James D. White, University of Glasgow