Unique in combining a comprehensive and comparative study of genre with a study of romance, this book constitutes a significant contribution to ongoing critical debates over the definition of romance and the genre and artistry of Malory's Morte Darthur. K.S. Whetter offers an original approach to these issues by prefacing a comprehensive study of romance with a wide-ranging and historically diverse study of genre and genre theory. In doing so Whetter addresses the questions of why and how romance might usefully be defined and how such an awareness of genre-and the expectations that come with such awareness-impact upon both our understanding of the texts themselves and of how they may have been received by their contemporary medieval audiences. As an integral part the study Whetter offers a detailed examination of Sir Thomas Malory's Le Morte Darthur, a text usually considered a straightforward romance but which Whetter argues should be re-classified and reconsidered as a generic mixture best termed tragic-romance. This new classification is important in helping to explain a number of so-called inconsistencies or puzzles in Malory's text and further elucidates Malory's artistry. Whetter offers a powerful meditation upon genre, romance and the Morte which will be of interest to faculty, graduate students and undergraduates alike.
Table of Contents
Contents: Introduction; Generic kinds and contacts; Redefining medieval romance; Generic juxtapositioning in Malory's Morte DArthur; Conclusion; Bibliography; Index.
K.S. Whetter is currently Associate Professor of English at Acadia University, Canada. He is co-editor (with Raluca Radulescu) of Re-Viewing Le Morte Darthur (2005).
’Whetter's book is forthright in approach, thought-provoking in its material and attractively clear and jargon-free in its presentation. ... an admirable and highly readable book...’ Archiv fÃ¼r das Studium der Neueren Sprachen und Literaturen 'Whetter demonstrates clearly that there is value to the study of genre, not merely as a device for classification, but as a means of understanding the meaning of individual works and of the social and intellectual contexts in which they were produced.' Sixteenth Century Journal