1st Edition

Clinical Law for Clinical Practice

By Robert Wheeler Copyright 2020
    162 Pages
    by CRC Press

    162 Pages
    by CRC Press

    Clinicians must practice medicine in conformity with regulatory requirements. That is the daily challenge, and those requirements have been founded on medical law.

    This book describes clinical law. A series of 62 brief commentaries are described, each setting out an important clinical legal case decided in an English court. The clinical relevance of the judgement is explained, together with how it should influence the care of the patient. Clinical readers are given skeleton guidance by their regulators, but almost no specific tuition as to how to apply it. This book sets out how clinical law has been applied in numerous cases, and thus provides guidance which is directly applicable to every clinician’s practice in the United Kingdom.

    Although most court cases concentrate on the medical aspects of patients’ care, the common currencies within clinical law touch on all clinical professions. Doctors, physiotherapists and others take consent every day; pharmacists must protect confidentiality; speech therapists consider the capacity of their patients; and nurses wrestle with discussions relating to whether their patients wish to be resuscitated

    The book is directed at members of the eight regulated clinical professions, the lawyers who deal with disputes, and all potential patients.

    About the Author

    Robert Wheeler, RCS MS LLB(Hons) LLM is a Consultant Neonatal and Paediatric Surgeon. He is the Associate Medical Director for the Department of Clinical Law, University Hospital of Southampton, Southampton Hampshire, England and Honorary Senior Lecturer, University of Southampton.

    https://www.uhs.nhs.uk/HealthProfessionals/Clinical-law-updates/Clinicallawupdates.aspx

    Table of Contents

    Introduction

    1. Adults who refuse blood

    2. Discussing the prospects of cardiopulmonary resuscitation

    3. What should be disclosed when seeking consent

    4. Deprivation in Essex

    5. The first glimpse of a duty to warn?

    6. Can a patient choose her surgeon?

    7. Sentiments

    8. Unwise decisions

    9. Consulting relatives

    10. Doctrine of double effect

    11. Needle Phobia

    12. Candid over complications

    13. Examining patients with their consent

    14. Covert treatment

    15. Can blood be compulsorily administered under the Mental Health Act 1983?

    16. Genetic confidentiality

    17. Refusing hospital discharge

    18. Consent for a cannula

    19. Changing direction in severe anorexia

    20. Be informed; then disclose

    21. Withdrawing treatment in a young man

    22. The value of going to court

    23. Articulating best interests

    24. Loyal Friends

    25. Apply to court?

    26. Disclosing the miniscule risk when seeking consent

    27. Obtaining consent

    28. Deprivation of Liberty; the story so far

    29. Falling from hospital property

    30. Gross negligence manslaughter: Perhaps better, "betrayal of trust"?

    31. Interpretation

    32. A narrow dispute

    33. A right to be told?

    34. "But all life is an experiment"

    35. Avoid discouraging patients from waiting to be treated

    36. Mixed messages

    37. It is for clinicians to identify foreseeable risks

    38. Separating twins

    39. Body modification

    40. Seeking the approval of a court for paternity testing

    41. Children refusing treatment

    42. Can we rely on our Advance Decisions?

    43. Is there a role for ‘next of kin’?

    44. Preaching to patients

    45. Deceiving patients

    46. Determining incapacity

    47. Reasons for refusing blood?

    48. Justifying the termination of a pregnancy

    49. The feasibility of a covert Caesarean section

    50. Communicating risk: Words or numbers?

    51. Stark compulsion in grave circumstances

    52. Going to court too soon

    53. Best interests in the absence of suffering

    54. Patients value candour

    55. Informed Consent & Informed Dissent: Two sides of a coin?

    56. Parental consent for their child’s deprivation of liberty.

    57. Vulnerable with capacity

    58. Compulsory treatment for diabetes

    59. Approving palliation

    60. Acquiescence; not consent

    61. Making clinical legal decisions

    Biography

    Robert Wheeler, RCS MS LLB(Hons) LLM is a Consultant Neonatal and Paediatric Surgeon. He is the Associate Medical Director for the Department of Clinical Law, University Hospital of Southampton, Southampton Hampshire, England and Honorary Senior Lecturer, University of Southampton.

    https://www.uhs.nhs.uk/HealthProfessionals/Clinical-law-updates/Clinicallawupdates.aspx