200 Pages 13 B/W Illustrations
    by Routledge

    The Comprehensive Aphasia Test (CAT) is a test for use with people who have acquired aphasia, that can be completed over one or two assessment sessions. The test includes a user manual, a cognitive screen and language battery, and a scoring booklet, which are all unchanged since the previous edition, and - new to this release - a concise Aphasia Impact Questionnaire which replaces the Disability Questionnaire. The cognitive section assesses people's abilities across a range of task that can affect rehabilitation. Forming the main body of the test, the language battery provides a profile of performance across all modalities of language production and comprehension. The Aphasia Impact Questionnaire is a pictorial Patient Reported Outcome Measure, which produces both qualitative and quantitative information. It was co-produced with people with aphasia. It supports the person with aphasia to give a subjective rating of how language difficulties identified in the Language Battery affect their daily life, enabling first steps towards goal setting.

    By capturing this information, the CAT helps the therapist track changes over the course of recovery and provides a guide to likely outcomes on the basis of an early assessment. The first two sections of the CAT are supported by normative data on people both with and without aphasia, and extensive data on reliability and clinical validity. The CAT allows users to:

    • Identify underlying impairments
    • Find where to focus assessments using PALPA and other batteries
    • Ascertain the practical, psychological, and social impact of aphasia, from the perceptive of the person with aphasia
    • Create a profile of strengths and weaknesses to guide therapy.

    Structured around fully up-to-date models of language assessment, from cognitive neuropsychology to patient reported outcome measures, test is an indispensable resource for speech and language therapists and researchers. It provides as much information about people's language ability as possible in a relatively brief test designed to be completed in 90-120 minutes.

    Additional scoring booklets can be ordered in packs of 10 at https://www.routledge.com/Comprehensive-Aphasia-Test-Scoring-Book-pack-of-10/Swinburn-Porter-Howard/p/book/ 9781032128177

    Acknowledgements

    1. Introduction

    Aphasia tests

    The need for the CAT

    The advantages of the CAT

    Structure of the CAT

    2. Directions for Administration and Rationale

    General introduction to administration of the test battery

    Detailed guide to rationale and administration of subtests

    THE COGNITIVE SCREEN

    1. Line bisection

    2. Semantic memory

    3. Word fluency

    4. Recognition memory

    5. Gesture object use

    6. Arithmetic

    THE LANGUAGE BATTERY

    Part 1: Language comprehension

    7. Comprehension of spoken words

    8. Comprehension of written words

    9. Comprehension of spoken sentences

    10. Comprehension of written sentences

    11. Comprehension of spoken paragraphs

    Part 2: Expressive language

    Repetition

    12. Repetition of words

    13. Repetition of complex words

    14. Repetition of nonwords

    15. Repetition of digit strings

    16. Repetition of sentences

    Spoken language production

    17. Naming objects

    18. Naming actions

    19. Spoken picture description

    Reading aloud

    20. Reading words

    21. Reading complex words

    22. Reading function words

    23. Reading nonwords

    Writing

    24. Writing: Copying

    25. Writing picture names

    26. Writing to dictation

    27. Written picture description

    THE APHASIA IMPACT QUESTIONNAIRE

    General introduction to the rationale and administration of the AIQ

    Detailed guide to rationale and administration of subtests

    28. Communication

    29. Participation

    30. Emotional Well-Being

    Modality summary scores

    The cognitive screen

    The language battery

    The aphasia impact questionnaire

    T-score transformation

    3. Interpretation of Results

    THE COGNITIVE SCREEN

    1. Line bisection

    2. Semantic memory

    3. Word fluency

    4. Recognition memory

    5. Gesture object use

    6. Arithmetic

    THE LANGUAGE BATTERY

    Part 1: Language comprehension

    7. Comprehension of spoken words

    8. Comprehension of written words

    9. Comprehension of spoken sentences

    10. Comprehension of written sentences

    11. Comprehension of spoken paragraphs

    Part 2: Expressive language

    Repetition

    12. Repetition of words

    13. Repetition of complex words

    14. Repetition of nonwords

    15. Repetition of digit strings

    16. Repetition of sentences

    Spoken language production

    17. Naming objects

    18. Naming actions

    19. Spoken picture description

    Reading aloud

    20. Reading words

    21. Reading complex words

    22. Reading function words

    23. Reading nonwords

    Writing

    24. Writing: Copying

    25. Writing picture names

    26. Writing to dictation

    27. Written picture description

    THE APHASIA IMPACT QUESTIONNAIRE

    28. Communication

    29. Participation

    30. Emotional well being

    THE T-SCORE PROFILE

    Example 1: Patient RP

    Example 2: Patient UA

    Example 3: Patient AC

    4. Reliability and Validity

    Standardisation samples

    T-score transformation

    Reliability

    Test–retest reliability

    Inter-rater reliability

    Comparing modality summary scores

    Construct validity

    The cognitive screen

    The language battery

    Predictive validity

    Concurrent validity

    5. Predicting Aphasia Recovery

    Introduction

    Study design

    Subjects

    Assessment

    Data management

    Results

    Patterns of recovery

    Predicting performance at 12 months

    Discussion

    Effects of therapy

    Comment

    References

    Appendices

    1. Worked examples (subtest 19)

    2. Derivation of T-scores from raw scores for cognitive subtests

    3. Derivation of T-scores from raw scores for language comprehension subtests

    4. Derivation of T-scores from raw scores for repetition and naming subtests

    5. Derivation of T-scores from raw scores for reading and writing subtests

    6. Derivation of T-scores from raw scores for spoken and
    written description subtests

    7. Derivation of "frontal" T-scores from the relationship between
    the scores in word fluency and naming objects

    Biography

    Dr Kate Swinburn is a speech and language therapist and freelance academic. She worked in the NHS and in the charity sector each for 10 years. In the NHS she worked with adults with neurological impairments. At Connect Kate was responsible for training, publications, and national policy. Her academic interests focus on people with acquired communication disability (particularly those with aphasia and dementia), working alongside them during co-produced projects, integrating the social model of disability into the research agenda, especially into outcome measurement. She is a member of the international network Collaboration of Aphasia Trialists supporting the adaptation of both the Comprehensive Aphasia Test and the Aphasia Impact Questionnaire into multiple languages (currently 28). She is an honorary lecturer at University College London and a Fellow of the Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists.

    Gillian Porter is a Speech and Language Therapist who has worked solely in the NHS. As well as her clinical work she has been the service lead for Speech & Language Therapy across acute, and community services, and county-wide professional lead for Speech and language Therapy. Her special interest is working with adults with neurological disorders.

    Professor David Howard is both a speech and language therapist and cognitive neuropsychologist. His research is on the cognitive neuropsychology of language, including written and spoken word comprehension and production as well as syntactic processing. Drawing data from both data from people with aphasia, and normal participants and brain imaging he wants to develop good computational models of word processing. He is a Fellow of the Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists.

    "The rationale for the test is excellent and the manual offers very useful and well-resourced guidance about related areas and pointers for clinicians." 

    Annette Cameron & Penny Gravill, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary in the British Aphasiology Society Newsletter