1st Edition

Implementing Performance Assessment Promises, Problems, and Challenges

Edited By Michael B. Kane, Ruth Mitchell Copyright 1996
236 Pages
by Routledge

236 Pages
by Routledge

240 Pages
by Routledge

As the commitment to performance assessments as a strategy of reform has increased across the nation, so has the controversy surrounding the purposes, development, implementation, and effects of alternative forms of assessment. One of the first of its kind, this edited volume provides an incisive and comprehensive account of the issues pertaining to performance assessments. The 10 papers... Read more
Contents: Preface. N. Khattri, D. Sweet, Assessment Reform: Promises and Challenges. D.P. Resnick, L.B. Resnick, Performance Assessment and the Multiple Functions of Educational Measurement. M. Wilson, R.J. Adams, Evaluating Progress with Alternative Assessments: A Model for Title 1. D.E. Wiley, E.H. Haertel, Extended Assessment Tasks: Purposes, Definitions, Scoring, and Accuracy. R.L. Linn, Linking Assessments. R. Hardy, Performance Assessment: Examining the Costs. D.H. Monk, Conceptualizing the Costs of Large-scale Pupil Performance Assessment. S.M. Stiegelbauer, Change has Changed: Implications for Implentation of Assessments from the Organizational Change Literature. L.B. Easton, P.H. Koehler, Arizona's Educational Reform: Creating and Capitalizing on the Conditions for Policy Development and Implementation. E.L. Baker, H.F. O'Neil, Jr., Performance Assessment and Equity.

Biography

Kane, Michael B.; Mitchell, Ruth

"...perhaps the most significant point of all about this publication, is that it derives from government-funded research and has been produced in a context of open debate about genuine alternatives."
British Journal of Educational Psychology

"...addresses questions of why new forms of assessment are necessary, whether or not the results will be fair and reliable, how change can be accomplished, and what it will all cost...the real interest for a UK audience lies in the differences the book reveals between American and British views of 'alternative' approaches to assessment."
British Journal of Educational Psychology