1st Edition

Twin Pandemics How a Global Health Crisis and Persistent Racial Injustices are Impacting Educational Assessment

    This book examines how the COVID-19 pandemic and racial inequities affect the educational assessment of students, either separately or in combination, as the health crisis was viewed as a factor intersecting with and exacerbating existing racial inequities in educational systems.

    The four empirical papers in this book attend to the challenges of implementing virtual standardized testing during the coronavirus pandemic, the different educational and assessment experiences of diverse groups of school-age students, and the reconsideration of traditional assessment approaches in response to mounting research evidence and growing concerns around enduring social and racial inequities faced by Black, Latinx, Asian, Indigenous, and other non-white citizens and communities. The four conceptual papers focus primarily on the ways in which assessment may contribute to systemic racism and offer potential solutions to move the educational assessment field forward. In totality, the volume offers needed empirical evidence, innovative methodological approaches, and theoretical and substantive examinations of the effects of the twin pandemics.

    Twin Pandemics will be a key resource for academics, researchers, and advanced students of Educational Assessment, Education, Psychometrics, Educational Research, Ethnic Studies, Research Methods, Sociology of Education and Psychology. The chapters included in this book were originally published as a special issue of Educational Assessment.

    Introduction to Twin Pandemics: How a Global Health Crisis and Persistent Racial Injustices are Impacting Educational Assessment
    Alison L. Bailey, José Felipe Martínez, Andreas Oranje and Molly Faulkner-Bond
     
    1. Early Literacy, Equity, and Test Score Comparability during the Pandemic
    James Soland, Anita McGinty, Allison Gray, Emily J. Solari, Walter Herring and Rujun Xu
     
    2. An Intersectional Approach to DIF: Comparing Outcomes across Methods
    Michael Russell, Olivia Szendey and Zhushan Li
     
    3. Assessment in the Time of COVID-19: Understanding Patterns of Student Disengagement during Remote Low-Stakes Testing
    Steven L. Wise, Megan R. Kuhfeld and John Cronin
     
    4. Allocating Resources for COVID-19 Recovery: A Comparison of Three Indicators of School Need
    Jonathan D. Schweig, Andrew McEachin, Megan Kuhfeld, Lou Mariano and Melissa Diliberti
     
    5. Disrupting White Supremacy in Assessment: Toward a Justice-Oriented, Antiracist Validity Framework
    Jennifer Randall, David Slomp, Mya Poe and Maria Elena Oliveri
     
    6. Towards an Antiracist Classroom Formative Assessment Framework
    Jade Caines Lee
       
    7. Indicators of Equitable Civic Learning in U.S. Public Schools
    Laura S. Hamilton and Julia H. Kaufman
     
    8. Two Communities’ Views on Test Fairness
    Drew H. Gitomer and Emi Iwatani

    Biography

    Alison L. Bailey is Professor and Division Head of Human Development and Psychology, Dept. of Education, University of California, Los Angeles.

    José Felipe Martínez is Professor in the Social Research Methods Division, Dept. of Education, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Andreas Oranje is Managing Director, National Conference of Bar Examiners.

    Molly Faulkner-Bond is Senior Research Associate on the English Learner and Migrant Education Services team at WestEd.